Or he turns his setting screen lock to never, charges it, walks away, then comes back
Printable View
Or he turns his setting screen lock to never, charges it, walks away, then comes back
Maybe he's just getting on at the same time you are getting on... Its a possibility
Quote:
Originally Posted by showdang
I check throughout the day before I made that claim; more then 15 times. So every time I check he log on at the same time? To say all that was just a coincidence is just silly. You might as well say u saw Jesus turn water into wine yesterday. And you are missing the big picture of this discussion. That was an example I used, not the main reason for the thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxionXD
I support the OP. Some times is meet those "players" as well. I deal with it, but I prefer not to. I mean if player has no life — no problem, but, since I'm a bit of technical and I know how to beat the system — I tend to think that I'm being a victim of unfair use. All because CoC has no protection against it.
A random human verification question / picture popping up every hour to 4 of constant activity would give much more trouble to the macro writers. Of course, they will improve their macro/bot programs, but it will be much more problematic. Besides, if SuperCell can keep the quiz updated every week, that would phase out most of them. However, it looks like companies nowadays won't willing to spend an extra coin and prefer to lie that botting isn't something they witness.
15 times in a 24 hour period? You are a genius at devising a scientific and fool proof method of proving your point with that sample!Quote:
Originally Posted by viet0022x
Do you know how many times someone hit revenge on you but couldn't because you were online? You don't, won't and never will but I promise you, you've made more enemies then friends out there. So unless your a coc hermit that doesn't attack anyone of worth and relies on collectors for all your loot, you're on a lot of revenge lists buddy. The more able you are to revenge, the more you are also vulnerable to revenge.
If they implemented your idea, I guarantee you'll be one of the first to complain and ask whos dumb idea it was to do this....
You have no proof the player has been on 24/7 especially considering there is a 6 hour time limit...
Lol u are an idiot that is trying to sound smart. Why would u make a scientific method to see if someone is only or not? Moron lol. O I'm going to scienctifically explain if he is online or not. How stupid does that sound.Pretty stupid right? Yes I know it ok. U are an idiot. If it was up to ppl like you then the world would not have evolve to where we are at right now. Ppl like you are followers, that think everything is good the way it is. If it was up ppl like u women would still not be able to vote, because u just follow. Change is not always a bad thing. Before you make changes for the best; you identify the problem, but then of course there is going to be idiots like u jumping in and saying o everything is good the way it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxionXD
Personally I don't spend that much money on this game. Couple bucks here and there, nothing big. However other ppl I talked to do spend the money. Surprising a lot of ppl spend over $500 on this game. So I believe that it is only fair that the game should make it to where the game play is fair for all players; as long as it is within their power. This game is the top grossing game after all. Granted, they would have to put out some money for a human verification program in the short term, but it would sustain a good game play and draw more ppl+money in the long run.Quote:
Originally Posted by MYEPTE
If they choose to spend a majority of the day on clash then that is fine, the mandatory does work to kick players off.
First of all, relax. Breathe. Close your eyes. Inhale. Count to ten. Exhale. Eat a snickers....Quote:
Originally Posted by viet0022x
....better?
In order to prove a point, you must have a solid basis of proof. Yes, I was being sarcastic using the term scientific, but your "I checked 15 times in a day!" method was clearly far from proof of any wrong doing or enough evidence that warrants a change to the games shielding dynamics.
Feel free to continue being derogatory though, I don't mind.
Trust me, I'm far from a follower.
How could you possibly extract from my post discussing of.... if you allowed revenges to be easier you would be revenged just as easily.....to people "like me" would have allowed women to not ever be allowed to vote?
Dear GOD, no wonder you thought "checking 15 times in one day" proved your point, you have no problem stretching your observations to arrive at your predetermined and biased conclusions like a Stretch Armstrong doll!
If I "just follow" ....by your logic, wouldn't I have "just followed" you and your idea? Isn't the simple fact that I opposed your idea make me not a follower?
I agree that change is not always a bad thing, however, the change you wish to implement most certainly is. What is so difficult for you to see that this is an issue of two sides to a coin? Are you that terrible at raiding that you are not afraid of others revenging you?