Why doesn't supercell just fix the loot problem by...

Would love this system :o:o:o:o:o
I always reach the cap when people attack me so it doesn't matter for me if the % change :D
And I dont do collectors raid. I do storage raids so I would raid the ♥♥♥♥ out of people:cool::cool::cool:
Promote this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by o0oAnnyo0o

Would love this system :o:o:o:o:o
I always reach the cap when people attack me so it doesn't matter for me if the % change :D
And I dont do collectors raid. I do storage raids so I would raid the ♥♥♥♥ out of people:cool::cool::cool:
Promote this

---

So your ok with getting less loot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pete82

He said nothing about the cap. The cap would remain unchanged. He just wants a higher % of loot to be available. This would make it easier to hit the cap, so more storage raids would appear to be attractive to attackers. Less nexting.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dasyoyo16

Ugh no... didn't say remove the cap just said increase available loot
Th 5 40% with a cap of 200k
Th 6 36% with a cap of 200k
Th 7 32% with a cap of 250k
Th 8 28% with a cap of 300k
Th 9 24% with a cap of 350k
Th 10 20% with a cap of 400k

So if a th 10 had between 4 mil gold and 8 mil gold you could only steal a max of 400k
loot

With my loot system if a th 10 had between 2mil gold and 8mil gold you can only steal - max of 400k loot

So it's just easier to reach the cap I didn't remove or make the cap higher

---

Sorry, I stand corrected. My bad!

But again, I don't see this working. More loot they can steal from you = more people dumping gold.

Loots fine. A few statistical anomalies and people who just can not be satisfied do not justify changing the loot system.

Loot is just as important to SC as it is to the players. If it needs adjustment they will adjust it.

p.s. Wrong sub forum.

Then people will moan about loosing too many resources on defense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jc1589b

i dont think that would work. its true we will find more available loot that way but we will also lose alot more loot, which will equal to having to raid more to make up for the lost. the way it is now i find it to be fine. loot is unpredictable its low some days and good other days, you have to remember that their is million of players stealing loot so its not going to be high 100% of the time.

---

No, you don't get it.

For people like me who hoard lots of loot, I will not lose any more because the cap is unchanged.

But for people who are always broke because they don't play much, they will offer much more because the percent of what they do have is more.

I can’t tell you how irritating it is to NEXT millions of times through bases that have good defenses, but nothing to loot because they dump most of it into their walls before logging off or save up for only one upgrade at a time.


This change is not without its flaws. It would make it harder for casual player who never raid to save up anything because they would lose more. Personally, I would rather they buff the loot bonus substantially so that attacking a completely broke base would still be profitable. I still can’t believe there is no DE loot bonus in gold league.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coathanger

Loots fine. A few statistical anomalies and people who just can not be satisfied do not justify changing the loot system.

Loot is just as important to SC as it is to the players. If it needs adjustment they will adjust it.

p.s. Wrong sub forum.

---

Loot is not fine. Your standards of pink walls at TH9 are just low.

Read this kids sig about sockpuppets to see why he tries to push his "loot is fine" agenda in every thread.

why would supercell put inactives front in matchmaking
look at that there are still lots of nexters if i were sc i would make loot harder than now
i think people only quit this game if they can get 10k gold at most from a raid
what a patient community well done sc congrat

This is why the old (pre December) loot system was better, collector raids or not.

Higher % from attacks = more people will offer something = less nexts.

I would even propose that lowering the cap to about 50-75% of what it is now would help. That would make it easier to save up for upgrades, since finding someone offering 200k+ in storages currently is completely luck, but if you're sitting on 5mil, you have a 100% chance of your opponent finding you.

All the players' want is more consistency, less nexting, and being able to save up for upgrades. The current loot system does the opposite of that. The reason people dump so much gold is because of the high loot cap. It has nothing to do with the %.

+1 to this idea.

This idea is great!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pinear

So your ok with getting less loot

---

Nah, I'm getting MORE loot if they use this system :)