Clan Wars Loot

Suggestion: distribute clan wars loot to the winning clan based (at least somewhat) on overall team performance.

Currently the system distributes loot based on who you attack. This incentivizes lower rated members to target more difficult bases to get 1 star and get the loot. While this may be in their best interest it is typically not in the best interest of the clan as a whole. The clan would be much better served if that member had taken three stars from a more appropriate target.

I am hoping supercell can devise a distribution system that would encourage clan members to act in the best interest of the team as a whole.

Thank you

If you could give an actual suggestion as to how that could be done, I would comment on that. I agree something like thins is needed.

Something along the lines of placing total loot earned during a war into a pool. If the clan wins the war the loot is allocated to each member

The allocation probably can't be exactly pro rata since higher level members deserve more since they almost certainly spent more in the war efforts ... But the distribution could be formulaic based on rank in the clan.

As I said, I truly believe that creating a distribution system of that type would ensure that clans work as a team as opposed to on am individual basis.

I appreciate your response

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicholos

Something along the lines of placing total loot earned during a war into a pool. If the clan wins the war the loot is allocated to each member

The allocation probably can't be exactly pro rata since higher level members deserve more since they almost certainly spent more in the war efforts ... But the distribution could be formulaic based on rank in the clan.

As I said, I truly believe that creating a distribution system of that type would ensure that clans work as a team as opposed to on am individual basis.

I appreciate your response

---

Hmm... maybe it could be a formula based on the amount you pay (judged by what you use in your raid) and how many stars you get.



Off-topic: When replying specifically to a person's comment, you can click the reply with quote button located at the bottom right of their post. If you want to reply to multiple people's comments, you can hit the button next to it on all the posts you want to quote and hit the reply to post button

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sirhybrid

Hmm... maybe it could be a formula based on the amount you pay (judged by what you use in your raid) and how many stars you get.



Off-topic: When replying specifically to a person's comment, you can click the reply with quote button located at the bottom right of their post. If you want to reply to multiple people's comments, you can hit the button next to it on all the posts you want to quote and hit the reply to post button

---

Thank you for the hint.

I like your idea. Both of those metrics would encourage clan members to attack strategically in the war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicholos

Suggestion: distribute clan wars loot to the winning clan based (at least somewhat) on overall team performance.

Currently the system distributes loot based on who you attack. This incentivizes lower rated members to target more difficult bases to get 1 star and get the loot. While this may be in their best interest it is typically not in the best interest of the clan as a whole. The clan would be much better served if that member had taken three stars from a more appropriate target.

I am hoping supercell can devise a distribution system that would encourage clan members to act in the best interest of the team as a whole.

Thank you

---

I think you should get loot acording to how many stars u get, so 1/3 for 1 star 2/3 fro 2 stars and all of it for 3 star

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nicholos

Thank you for the hint.

I like your idea. Both of those metrics would encourage clan members to attack strategically in the war.

---

Anytime :)

Another hint: you can edit the OP (original post) by hitting the edit button (right next to reply with quote, on the left) and you can edit any ideas you like (cough cough mine cough cough) into the post and people ill see that. If you wish, you can say it is an edit. Most people go like this


EDIT: blah blah blah.

This is not a good idea, you shouldn't make them behave, if the clan works together well there's no need.
if not, the clan's no good and shouldn't win!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aragnok

This is not a good idea, you shouldn't make them behave, if the clan works together well there's no need.
if not, the clan's no good and shouldn't win!

---

I suppose that's one way to look at it. But, if the goal of clan wars is to put my top guys vs. your top guys and see who is better, then clan wars is a failure because that is absolutely not what happens. My clan has fought a bunch of wars, most of which we win, but we don't win because we are better ... We win because the other clan makes dumber attacks because the incentives are all messed up.

In addition we typically win because the high level guys subsidize our weaker members to a ridiculous extent ... Making the cost of war way too high for them and way too low for our bottom level guys.

I would be shocked if your experiences are different. How often does your clan face an opponent that makes horrible strategic moves?

Thanks for the reply

Let the clan leader has a switch to decide between capitalism and communism.

In capitalism you keep what you loot. i.e. current loot system

In communism all the loot goes into a pot then gets divided according to rank first. So say there are 4 people in the clan( I know not possible but I dont want to math more) and there is 10mil loot total in the pot then
1st rank gets 4mil.
2nd gets 3mil.
3rd gets 2mil.
4th gets 1mil.
But wait 2nd didnt get any stars and 3rd got only 3 stars !
So 2nd does not get anything (3mil * 0/6 stars)
and 3rd gets only (2mil * 3/6 stars) 1 mil.
So basically nobody gets the 4 mil and it is lost.