Player Reputation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KevinCOC

Sounds like a pretty good idea, but can be misleading in many ways. I can see this as a bad way to "rule out" players. What if a player is a regular in a donation 24/7 clan and has a horrid donation ratio? All the clans would rule him out. What if a player is a hopper but then later in his Coc career decides to be loyal? These reputation points should be reset-able imo, so in case you screw up sometime, the community doesn't take u for it.

---

This is a big part of it.

SC doesn't want its players to receive a bad permanent or even semi-permanent record.

This is the exact reason why for clan wars, they only post clan wins instead of a win-loss ratio.

They don't want clans to look necessarily better or worse based on their win/loss record because it would be an influx of players bombarding clans with amazing records, and the clans with bad records would have a terribly tough time recruiting, causing frustration for members of that clan.

They want as even a playing field as possible for everyone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KevinCOC

Sounds like a pretty good idea, but can be misleading in many ways. I can see this as a bad way to "rule out" players. What if a player is a regular in a donation 24/7 clan and has a horrid donation ratio? All the clans would rule him out. What if a player is a hopper but then later in his Coc career decides to be loyal? These reputation points should be reset-able imo, so in case you screw up sometime, the community doesn't take u for it.

---

Yep, you have a point over there, things can be changed but still i think we need this idea we can fix it with your thoughts and suggestions until it become perfect! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hawdog

This is a big part of it.

SC doesn't want its players to receive a bad permanent or even semi-permanent record.

This is the exact reason why for clan wars, they only post clan wins instead of a win-loss ratio.

They don't want clans to look necessarily better or worse based on their win/loss record because it would be an influx of players bombarding clans with amazing records, and the clans with bad records would have a terribly tough time recruiting, causing frustration for members of that clan.

They want as even a playing field as possible for everyone.

---

Well what I'm suggesting is to have a record for the player himself not records for the clan. I need to know this player if he is good bad hooper or whatever so I can make a disesion when accepting or rejecting him

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KevinCOC

Sounds like a pretty good idea, but can be misleading in many ways. I can see this as a bad way to "rule out" players. What if a player is a regular in a donation 24/7 clan and has a horrid donation ratio? All the clans would rule him out. What if a player is a hopper but then later in his Coc career decides to be loyal? These reputation points should be reset-able imo, so in case you screw up sometime, the community doesn't take u for it.

---

If you could reset your reputation, I think that defeats the whole purpose. Kind of like a person's credit score. But, besides that, SC tries to keep the game as anonymous as possible to try and level the playing field and give everyone the same playing experience. This is why you can't seek out specific people/clans to attack. For better or worse....

I think they should just add:

• Number of clans joined (resets every league)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jarrah

Well what I'm suggesting is to have a record for the player himself not records for the clan. I need to know this player if he is good bad hooper or whatever so I can make a disesion when accepting or rejecting him

---

I totally agree with this. I would like to know how many clans a person has been in. That way you can tell if they jump from clan to clan.

Add attacks/non attacks used in wars so people don't join the not use the attacks they have