Fast building

Currently Ruled Out Currently Ruled Out
Currently Ruled Out Currently Ruled Out

More than one builder upgrading something.

For example:
Hall town needs 8 days using one builder, we can make in 4 days using 2 builders.
It will be good for upgrading Barracks faster because we need to train troops fast.


It wont really make it faster

it wont be a problem it will take the same time in the end.
like upgrading 2 gold mines
first one take 4 days
secnd one take 4 days
i can use 2 builders on one it will take 2 days
then again the other one 2 days using the same 2 builders
in the end it toke 4 days

Currently Ruled Out Currently Ruled Out
Currently Ruled Out Currently Ruled Out

Pretty good idea. But not likely to happen

Maybe a little too easy and extreme to halve the time. Maybe it can take away one day per builder. Example: Town hall takes 8 days, with 2 builders it takes 7, with 3 it takes 6.

It would also create a problem, what if something takes 2 days and you have 3 builders?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SirFarnusII

Maybe a little too easy and extreme to halve the time. Maybe it can take away one day per builder. Example: Town hall takes 8 days, with 2 builders it takes 7, with 3 it takes 6.

It would also create a problem, what if something takes 2 days and you have 3 builders?

---

nothing will happen if u have 3 builders:cool: it will be even faster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SirFarnusII

Maybe a little too easy and extreme to halve the time. Maybe it can take away one day per builder. Example: Town hall takes 8 days, with 2 builders it takes 7, with 3 it takes 6.

It would also create a problem, what if something takes 2 days and you have 3 builders?

---

it wont be a problem it will take the same time in the end.

like upgrading 2 gold mines
first one take 4 days
secnd one take 4 days

i can use 2 builders on one it will take 2 days

then again the other one 2 days using the same 2 builders

in the end i toke 4 days

I mean if something takes 2 days and you use 4 builders would it only take 6 hours?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dfield

nothing will happen if u have 3 builders:cool: it will be even faster

---

yeah right

Please go read the sticky you illiterate. This thread is banned. This discussion topic has been put down hundreds of times.

Ruled out. Read the sticky

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Denboi

Please go read the sticky you illiterate. This thread is banned. This discussion topic has been put down hundreds of times.

---

they say " anything builder's huts related-would cause players to advance too fast, SC loses profit "

but my idea wont make the whole building faster... i already said it


it wont be a problem it will take the same time in the end.

like upgrading 2 gold mines
first one take 4 days
secnd one take 4 days

i can use 2 builders on one it will take 2 days

then again the other one 2 days using the same 2 builders

in the end i toke 4 days


so my post is fine..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zanob

they say " anything builder's huts related-would cause players to advance too fast, SC loses profit "

but my idea wont make the whole building faster... i already said it


it wont be a problem it will take the same time in the end.

like upgrading 2 gold mines
first one take 4 days
secnd one take 4 days

i can use 2 builders on one it will take 2 days

then again the other one 2 days using the same 2 builders

in the end i toke 4 days


so my post is fine..

---

That is such irrational thinking. Fair enough in that case same amount of days but not everything is in pairs?? There's only 1 town hall, there's 3 mortars, wizards and air defenses at th8. There's one spell factory and one research lab. So on each of those you'd gain time?? And if it doesn't make a difference why on earth would you want to implement it? Illogical.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Denboi

That is such irrational thinking. Fair enough in that case same amount of days but not everything is in pairs?? There's only 1 town hall, there's 3 mortars, wizards and air defenses at th8. There's one spell factory and one research lab. So on each of those you'd gain time?? And if it doesn't make a difference why on earth would you want to implement it? Illogical.

---

as i said

it will make upgrading Barracks faster
cuz when we upgrade it get slower when we train troops

and sometimes when we finish upgrading every thing and then upgrade the hall town some builders get free doing nothing because there isn't any thing to upgrade

I would love to see this happen but i think the reason we haven't so far is because to extra builders cost gems and that is money. It would turn the game into a pay to win type game which they are trying to stay away from. I realize that you can currently purchase gems but they eventually run out forcing you to buy more. Permanently unlocking a builder would be a MAJOR advantage over the " Poor " players and would also be the nudge that supercell is trying to avoid.

Not really. If everything is maxed and all you have left is the TH and you put 4 builders on it, you're cutting down the time.

You're saying it's the same amount of time if you're upgrading something at the same time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cscones

Not really. If everything is maxed and all you have left is the TH and you put 4 builders on it, you're cutting down the time.

You're saying it's the same amount of time if you're upgrading something at the same time.

---

well that's not a big problem, it's better than waiting and have free builders
for me i calculate it every time and all my builders finish at the same time with the hall town
so putting all builders on hall town not a problem it will be better cuz i dont have to calculate

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedRogue99

I would love to see this happen but i think the reason we haven't so far is because to extra builders cost gems and that is money. It would turn the game into a pay to win type game which they are trying to stay away from. I realize that you can currently purchase gems but they eventually run out forcing you to buy more. Permanently unlocking a builder would be a MAJOR advantage over the " Poor " players and would also be the nudge that supercell is trying to avoid.

---

u can get all the builders if u didnt use any gem
i didnt use any and i have 4 builders now " using free gem "

They just want to earn money. If this option is considered then it ill cost them a big amount of gem money that people spend to speed up the constrution time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zanob

More than one builder upgrading something.

For example:
Hall town needs 8 days using one builder, we can make in 4 days using 2 builders.

It will be good for upgrading Barracks faster because we need to train troops fast.


It wont really make it faster

it wont be a problem it will take the same time in the end.

like upgrading 2 gold mines
first one take 4 days
secnd one take 4 days

i can use 2 builders on one it will take 2 days

then again the other one 2 days using the same 2 builders

in the end it toke 4 days

---

You bolded that statement, but how does making something that takes 4 days and make it take 2 days not making it faster? That's actually DOUBLE the speed.

Anyways, this idea is ruled out.

Ruled out. Read sticky and don't use your logic since it doesn't make sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxionXD

You bolded that statement, but how does making something that takes 4 days and make it take 2 days not making it faster? That's actually DOUBLE the speed.

Anyways, this idea is ruled out.

---

it's double faster for one thing..
and double slower for other thing...

Ruled out.Read the stickies.Also,your logic still doesn't make sense at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manazran

Ruled out.Read the stickies.Also,your logic still doesn't make sense at all.

---

they say " anything builder's huts related-would cause players to advance too fast, SC loses profit "
it's not making it soo fast, so it's not ruled out -__-

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zanob

they say " anything builder's huts related-would cause players to advance too fast, SC loses profit "
it's not making it soo fast, so it's not ruled out -__-

---

That's kinda like saying that halving 10 years to 5 years isn't much of a diffrence.

---

Its ruled out

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zanob

they say " anything builder's huts related-would cause players to advance too fast, SC loses profit "
it's not making it soo fast, so it's not ruled out -__-

---

It would be balanced at th3-early th 8 but the problem is once your upgrades are 5-8mil gold you are most likely going to always have 4-5 builders working on a tower-- Then it will get really boring when you go 3-5 days with 5 builders idle The loot in/builder productivity is going to be off balance. A 12 day upgrade which takes a week+ to farm the resources for would take 2 and a half days to complete. It would make life at th 9/10 fairly uneventful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manazran

That's kinda like saying that halving 10 years to 5 years isn't much of a diffrence.

---

u are not getting it at all...
the time wont change...
if i have 2 builder and 2 things to upgrade
first need 4 days
2nd need 4 days

if i put on builder on first and builder on 2nd both will end in 4 days

if 2 builders on one the first they will end in 2 days " only one thing "
then 2 days again for the 2nd thing

in the end it toke 4 days

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zanob

u are not getting it at all...
the time wont change...
if i have 2 builder and 2 things to upgrade
first need 4 days
2nd need 4 days

if i put on builder on first and builder on 2nd both will end in 4 days

if 2 builders on one the first they will end in 2 days " only one thing "
then 2 days again for the 2nd thing

in the end it toke 4 days

---

But if you had 4 builders,would it be the same thing?

I'm with u Zanob, Great idea. When we upgrade our village to level 10,,some upgrades will take 1 year to complete. I posted the same idea..but after posted, when i returned to home page, your post appeared to me with the same problem.

I vote to use more builders to complete some upgrades or buildings

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zanob

they say " anything builder's huts related-would cause players to advance too fast, SC loses profit "

but my idea wont make the whole building faster... i already said it


it wont be a problem it will take the same time in the end.

like upgrading 2 gold mines
first one take 4 days
secnd one take 4 days

i can use 2 builders on one it will take 2 days

then again the other one 2 days using the same 2 builders

in the end i toke 4 days


so my post is fine..

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Manazran

But if you had 4 builders,would it be the same thing?

---

it will be the same... 2 3 4 5 it's all the same

The reason you can't assign multiple builders to an upgrade is because it is unfair. Not only are you decreasing the requiredtime set out by SC to complete an upgrade WITHOUT paying for gems, you are also decreasing the number of buildings being upgraded at a particular time, meaning more buildings can defend your base than if you had 1 builder per building (up to 5 defensive buildings down at a time, instead of just 1 building for 1/5th of the required time).

It's unfair.(by hawdog)
Currently Ruled Out:
Here are some amazing ideas that have been ruled out by the dev time for the time being. Posting these ideas will result in your thread being locked!



Frequently Requested:
*Donating (or trading) resources or gems to (with) other players
*An exchange building to convert between elixir, gold, dark elixir, or gems
*Assign multiple builders to one build/upgrade
(from the sticky)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by himanshu440

The reason you can't assign multiple builders to an upgrade is because it is unfair. Not only are you decreasing the requiredtime set out by SC to complete an upgrade WITHOUT paying for gems, you are also decreasing the number of buildings being upgraded at a particular time, meaning more buildings can defend your base than if you had 1 builder per building (up to 5 defensive buildings down at a time, instead of just 1 building for 1/5th of the required time).

It's unfair.(by hawdog)
Currently Ruled Out:
Here are some amazing ideas that have been ruled out by the dev time for the time being. Posting these ideas will result in your thread being locked!



Frequently Requested:
*Donating (or trading) resources or gems to (with) other players
*An exchange building to convert between elixir, gold, dark elixir, or gems
*Assign multiple builders to one build/upgrade
(from the sticky)

---

ohh i got it now...
like some people would pay gems to do the town hall
they can cut time and pay less..
guess can't do anything about it then...