Or maybe just add more single player missions......?
Printable View
Or maybe just add more single player missions......?
I really like this idea, however you should not pay for a new village, you should just be able to switch between more and there should be no interaction with your different villages.
So if you have 5 builders on 1 village, you would have to buy 5 on your others as well. This would give Supercell the opportunity to gain more money from current players as well. Win Win.
Its a good point with the builders, do you think that gems should carry ive for both, or should they each have their own amount? And its not a large amount if gold, just enough so that someone whos low vl doesnt make 15 accounts and runs a clan on his own.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ljungstroem
I feel like it should be like buying a new device, nothing should be carried over, and you would also have to make another name for your village, or at least it should be visible to other players that this is one of many.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakillamilla
Simply people are allowed to have more villages, and they are all run separately, meaning if you're within the same trophy range you should even have the chance to raid your own village.
You would be able to spend so much more time on the game.
There should be a maximum of villages you could have though, like 3 or so.
I agree with everything else besides the max, this is to help keep players wrapped into it, the cap would e the ever increasing cost, since itll cost so much ppl wont just go but 15 right off since they can't afford it.
If there should be no max, you would have to be at least TH5 or something in order to create a new village. This would prevent people from making a ton of useless villages for other people to step by when trying to raid people. You have to think wider than your own perspective, but how would this affect other people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakillamilla
Too many forgotten villages is not needed in this game.
If you have an Android device with multiple Google accounts tied to it it is already as easy as it gets to swap villages. I understand iOS does it differently, but implementing something similar on iOS would basically solve this problem. (On Android you just go to Settings > Link to Google+, tap link button twice, select other account, and type CONFIRM. Same thing to go back. Takes less than 15 seconds, with village re-load and all)
However, keep in mind multiple accounts violates SC ToS to an extent (hopefully I'm not doing so by posting how to have multiples on Android - if so I apologize!) so they would need to change the verbiage in their ToS with this. Due to this I don't really see this happening.
Having multiple accounts can lead to bad things at higher-level gameplay as well, such as cheap shielding and the like. Putting it all under a unified umbrella and making it so you couldn't raid your own villages would help, however the fact is Super Cell still couldn't fix the alt accounts they have now which are causing issues (i.e. multiple iOS devices, multiple Google accounts on a single Android device)
This will exactly remove the problem for people to have multiple accounts, because you are offering them multiple villages. As mentioned these villages cannot interact with each other, other than random selection from the game. You would only be able to face another of your own villages by luck, meaning the chances are the same of you running into on of your friends' villages.
Th 6 is already a dissapointint th i grade as it is why not offer this to spices it up?
You should at least have some sort of knowledge about the game before mass-creating villages you know nothing about how to build. Also you should have spent at least a fair amount of time on the game itself, tempting you to buy new builders because of the long waits.
There would be no benefits for Supercell to do this, unless you give them a reason. Also I would hate seeing even more abandoned and idiotic created villages than there already is. You should earn the ability to create a new village.