New loot system

After this you will be the only one left playing clash

Alright first off your plan is extremely well though lt out. But your drastically reducing the amount of loot available for people to get. I get your trying to eliminate cheap tactics like sniping, collector raids, and shield hiding, but most people are dissatisfied with how little lot we get already, so drastically reducing that number makes them want to let's say say stupid comments in response to it? Overall people love their cheap tactics and wot support them being eliminated.

I'm not sure to what extent I understand your proposal. (I'm not going to comment on the hero part)

I can say it is well thought out idea. You have managed to give a good compensation so that in overall, both attackers and defenders would gain and lost apparently the same as what the current loot system is. I agree that your proposal could help reduce collector raids and shield hiding, which drastically benefit active players.

The only downside I could see from this proposal is auto collect, and I believe it is a major issue.

1st, it goes against what SC wants. SC want people to log into the game as frequent as possible. With auto-collect (well...it depends on when the auto-collect takes action -- 30%, 50% or 100% of the collector capacity), people may not log in even after the shield run out. In that case, it reduces the log in frequency, and consequently, interaction between clan-mates which is the so-called main differentiators between CoC and BoomBeach.

2nd, punishment to the inactive players may be reduced. However, from the other angle, the amount of the loot availability of the inactive base may increase substantially. Since the auto-collect help fill in the storage then both storages and collectors may be full at the same time. Although the probability is low, the expectation of the total loot available from the total inactive bases may not be different from what it is now. Take note that SC would see everything from the macro-scale rather than micro-scale, I believe. If the total loot from inactive bases is not decrease, SC would not earn more, therefore, modification is useless from SC perspective.

3rd, to balance your loot system, the 12-hours shield from TH raid must be removed (regardless of the star/percentage shield modification). It is to make sure that the total loot available at any point of time is similar to what it is now (I think you have thought of this too). It would then angry the medium player. Well..from a hard core players' views, it is a good idea. But the medium player one, it is not. I'm not sure which one SC earn more from, the hardcore or the medium guys, but losing anyone of them is a huge lost.

Although SC keep mentioning that game experience is the first priority compared to SC income, but I dont think SC would sacrifice a lot just to satisfy a portion of the gamers. Unless SC could make sure that it negatively affect a minority of the player, I dont think SC would go for the change. For your case, it negatively affect both inactive and occasional players.

Hope you could understand my point :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drone365

I had like to see some change to current loot and trophy system.
Here is my proposal.

First, reduce resource production by collectors by factor of x and make them auto collected. (slows down passive progression and no more collector raids)It wouldn't work to have collectors auto- collect. Then there would be no point in the building and would reduce activity, which SC doesn't want, even if it means more bases not available to attack.

Second, reduce % amount of resource that can be taken from storage by factor of x. (make people less afriad to break shield to do raid, and reduce number of people who stays online continuously to protect resource.)So you are saying that people should get less money than usual?

Thrid, add loot bonus for attacker that equals (x-1) times amount of loot one takes (compensates for reduction of collector resource production, and reduced amount of resource takable) Ok, I like the idea of this get a bigger loot bonus the more you steal (unless I misunderstood this). However, I don't want this to replace getting loot from the other players. The whole point of this game is to get your loot from multiplayer battles. The other player loses as much as you gain. The loot bonus is just a little extra.

Fourth, no more 12 hour shield for destroying townhall (less base hiding behind shield)I guess.

Fifth, change how tranfer of trophy works (1 star = no change in trophy for both attacker and defender, 2 star = half of trophies, and 3 star = all)
[Here you go balanced offense and defense]. You WON the attack. You should get trophies for it. And I don't see how this has anything to do with the loot system. A 1 star is not a tie. It is a WIN.

Lastly, change heroes back to what they were before. Ok, I guess

value of x is to be determine by supercell with internal testing.

This change will solve loot issue, reduce unintended play style, and make the game more skill oriented. The current play style of staying on for as long as possible is unintended. But the play style of getting resources by being active and from other players is the whole POINT of the game. I think it would make the loot issue worse. How does this make it more skill oriented?

---

Replies in bold​

So wrong that it hurts

Go back to Trolling School and listen to some more classes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drone365

I already stated a lot of time before (you are probably the account owner parent right? Hahaha) I got all As in school and I was in all honors and AP classes and I was the best in each classes. Meaning not only I had the highest average GPA, but also I was THE BEST in school.

---

So you're saying that you're a super arrogant kid who thinks he's the best at everything and you went to a really sheitty school which meant you actually were best at everything? Congrats... I'm currently a rising 10th grader and I promise you I have a higher IQ than you and most of the people in this forum (not meant to offend or anything...). I know a lot of people agree with me when I say this (not because we are dumb people not understanding a good idea but because we are smart people completely understanding a dumb idea): Leave this subject alone. It has been shot down by so many people and it is dumb. Please back off. All that will happen from this point on is you will continue to be embarrassed by your lack of knowledge. Stop digging yourself into a deeper hole and just leave well enough alone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evanp

This is a horrible idea...this not fixing problems, it is making more...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saruman

After this you will be the only one left playing clash

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by neelwood

So wrong that it hurts

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Geronimosemiro

Go back to Trolling School and listen to some more classes.

---

Just wow
Terrible low grade community.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by luk3namop

So you're saying that you're a super arrogant kid who thinks he's the best at everything and you went to a really sheitty school which meant you actually were best at everything? Congrats... I'm currently a rising 10th grader and I promise you I have a higher IQ than you and most of the people in this forum (not meant to offend or anything...). I know a lot of people agree with me when I say this (not because we are dumb people not understanding a good idea but because we are smart people completely understanding a dumb idea): Leave this subject alone. It has been shot down by so many people and it is dumb. Please back off. All that will happen from this point on is you will continue to be embarrassed by your lack of knowledge. Stop digging yourself into a deeper hole and just leave well enough alone.

---

Nope, I am stating the facts to acknowledge those who said "I get As" "I am in honors class" that how relatively stupid they are. If you think you have higher IQ than me you are welcome to take Mensa online IQ test and upload the test result on photo sharing sites (with some proof on the background to prove it is your testing result). There is a big difference between people disagreeing because they have different opinion and people disagreeing because they don't understand it. Clearly, in this case it is latter

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dakillamilla

Alright first off your plan is extremely well though lt out. But your drastically reducing the amount of loot available for people to get. I get your trying to eliminate cheap tactics like sniping, collector raids, and shield hiding, but most people are dissatisfied with how little lot we get already, so drastically reducing that number makes them want to let's say say stupid comments in response to it? Overall people love their cheap tactics and wot support them being eliminated.

---

Your post is invalid because you did not read part 3 which basically compensates for loot difference cause by part 2