****** SORRY WRONG SECTION
When you successfully destroyed a building that is upgrading/under construction, a few hours will be added to the upgrading/construction time.
Its kind of a nice payback, just to annoy your attacker if you can't have a decent loot. It will make you more careful in selecting a target lol
Wrong section, there's a section called ideas and feature requests. This is a rediculous idea btw. I already have to wait 8 days for my wizard tower to upgrade, I don't wanna wait any longer because somebodys idea of "revenge" is to increase build time rather than steal back resources like it was intended for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elothean
my bad, i posted on a wrong window.Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenh92
Just to answer your reply... well if you are the attacker that is bad, however if you are the one who was looted and then turn to revenge mode then find that there is nothing there to loot but only give the guy free shield then its frustrating... its not too revenge-y.
How do i close this thread?
Bad idea IMO, and I don't think you can close thread unless your a mod.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elothean
The resulting scenario i can imagine is...Quote:
Originally Posted by Dualsabers04
1. Players will use gems more (especially high level players)
2. You will rearrange your base a little bit to protect your construction.
No, it's enough that defenses don't work when they're under construction.
Please show me your base and ill try this... What is wrong with you?? This is the worst idea ever (rants on and on)... Srsly WHAT THE DERP?! I'd rather have a mega loot penalty...Quote:
Originally Posted by Elothean
I just find it annoying that when its your turn to revenge you'll find that they are mostly online and can't be attacked, have their shields up, and finally when you found one that is available there is no loot available.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gambit6
Where is the revenge in that? You are better off doing a regular attack
Just because its called 'revenge' doesn't mean you actually have to hate on the person. The fact that you want their upgrades to be longer, when there is no real benefit to you except to appease your petty feelings of hate, is just that...petty. Don't give supercell any ideas like this to make us spend more gems and waste more time, cuz they just might do it.
I don't find it a revenge at all if all you can do is loot. It is just like a normal attackQuote:
Originally Posted by Zombiebender
Well yeah i see your point. Its just that the revenge attacks and normal attacks are too similar, might as well remove the revenge option.Quote:
Originally Posted by CHINOBEER
I bet you would love to attack other ppl.... I bet you wouldn't like it if they sabotaged you! Imagine a upgrade that gets delayed FOREVER!! Your idea is ludicrous and should be taken back....please don't give supercell more ideas to make gem sales because this would hurt their customers A LOT... Even farmers and trophy chasers... If this happens the entire game will fall apart... And once the dust clears only the top gemmers remain.... If someone attacks you're not supposed to sabotage them but attack them for loot maybe out of spite but not sabotage and hate just because they outwitted your defence....Quote:
Originally Posted by Elothean
You used to be able to kill all troops the enemy had by simply destroying army camps. That was spiteful and quite revengeful (though it also worked when doing normal attacking - but you couldn't see what they had in camps as far as I remember... so that was no fun).
Users complained for an eternity and Supercell took heed and changed it so you aren't punished. This is more or less close to this. You'll never see this and only a very slim minority would approve of this idea.
key difference in attack match and revenge (if you didnt already know it):
1. you can carefully plan the troops required to successfully loot your attacker;
2. you can wait till they have a sizeable loot before you revenge;
3. revenged targets cannot revenge back
4. no matching fees
so plan your revenge properly and it can be more fruitful than a matched attack...
Okay i concede... bad idea