I was wondering why cant you use more than one builder on the same upgrade therfore upgrading it howerver much faster. Maybe there is a good reason why you cant do this but I definitely cant see it. Please enlighten me!
Thankyou
Printable View
I was wondering why cant you use more than one builder on the same upgrade therfore upgrading it howerver much faster. Maybe there is a good reason why you cant do this but I definitely cant see it. Please enlighten me!
Thankyou
To get you to spend gems if you want it done faster.
Those builders have a lot of pride and they hate teamwork.
The builders are unionized. it's in their contract that they have sole responsibility for a project.
No need to file a grievance.
Reason #1: It's overpowered.
You know when when you get attacked and wiped for 3 stars because you had 2 air defenses, a wiz tower, and two mortars under construction? Well that will never happen if you have 5 builders working on one upgrade to turn a 10 day upgrade into 2 days. In fact, every single upgrade you have available in the game that requires builders will only take 1/5th of the time, and no one will ever spread their builders out to do different jobs because it just doesn't make sense. Why would you want 5 buildings out of commission when you can simply have 1 building out of commission for only 20% of the time it would normally take 1 builder? OVERPOWERED.
Reason #2: It completes the building upgrade too fast.
The result is that much less people get impatient since the upgrade is so short, so they don't gem their upgrades, meaning SC loses out on that potential profit. SC feeds off of people's impatience. This would be counterproductive to their goal of making you spend more gems.
There are likely more reasons, but really, you don't need any more to understand why stacking builders is ruled out.
Money money money moooooney, MONEY.
Its super cells way to get to buy gems ;)