Printable View
How it would work:
- I attack a base and earn a 1-star victory
- that player revenges me and 3-stars me
(where the idea/change takes effect)
- I can re-revenge and recapture a maximum of 2-stars (even if you were to 3-star the base, the trophies you would receive would only equate to a 2-star victory)
So just a way to make clan wars even more competitive?
Hes talking about when some attacks you, not in clan warsQuote:
Originally Posted by Redblackbulldog
This would effect CW how?Quote:
Originally Posted by Redblackbulldog
It sounds like a good idea, but then... It would mean so many people would get shields we could eventually run out, if there is another way to revenge a revenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by junyab
Matchmaking would take too long, you would need to find a solution to that.
- HOW IT WOULD WORK.
Not - Wow it would work
Oh I see what you mean. I doubt SC would do this though, as revenge is meant to be a safe way of attacking without worry of further retaliation.Quote:
Originally Posted by trevo45
No, no. It should be: "Wow! It Would work."Quote:
Originally Posted by EpicChris
Forgot the exclamation point ;)
Let me correct that againQuote:
Originally Posted by junyab
- Wow! It wouldn't work.
Forgot the "n't"
I am totally against this idea.
1: if someone lighting bombs my dark elixir storage then i'm going three star them bad with an op army. he should not be able to attack me again.
2: if a lower town hall snipes me i get good revenge attacks, he shouldn't be able to snipe me again.
3: so many reason that I don't have time to list here why this is a bad idea.
That's EXACTLY the reason why this idea is good. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by arch133
Picking on lower town halls after they give you a nice 12-hour shield. Tsk tsk.
lol if you attack someone you should always expect to be revenged plain and simple. Which is why you don't poke the bear.Quote:
Originally Posted by junyab