Yes, another disappointed player

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nesparkey

Today my clan is in our first clan war against a bunch of these players... Sucks because i just got my first three stars on my 2 raids after a two push. We were all psyched because of the push ready. This clan came up and they look easy. Well the first raid was on player one and only the top players. Wth? Then we started noticing. And realized that they are ♥♥♥♥♥ing. Its one thing to have the ability to raid a base on the first and only try and receive 100% but not on the 20th try. Good for the other clan! Lol. We could devour those bases too. Very sad. It takes all the fun out. I agree with you. Proud of your clan. You are the real true winners!

---

It frustrating because you bring the clan moral up, you make troops to attack, and you give everyone advice on how to and who to attacks, and in the end.. you get ♥♥♥♥♥ers just ruin the whole war.. takes out the fun and makes the war less enjoyable.. just upsetting overall. SC should put the update on hold and work on fixing this, because this is ruining the game. They can beef-up the defense all they want, but if people can ghost your base 5-6 times before attacking.. you might as well just put the townhall out and put all defenses on one side and show a white flag.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Benson822175

While this is true, I dont see the benefit of allowing more people to learn about these cheets. So why not close the topics discussing them as they are already aware of it. once people figure out what it is and how to get it, its not difficult to get at all, and it would just increase usage by increasing peoples knowledge of it.

---

If it was discussed more it would be more likely that SC would do something about it. The more complaints they receive about it, the higher priority it would make it for them to stop the cheeting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sandiego

If it was discussed more it would be more likely that SC would do something about it. The more complaints they receive about it, the higher priority it would make it for them to stop the cheeting.

---

With third party programs there is no stopping them. They run independently of CoC and SC can only put things in the game to hinder them. This is why we have the forced break, it was the only way to mitigate people staying online continuously.

Trying to stop these programs is impossible, you can only hope they do not become widely used by dishonest people. This is why threads and discussions are closed and rightfully so, they only educate dishonest people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coathanger

With third party programs there is no stopping them. They run independently of CoC and SC can only put things in the game to hinder them. This is why we have the forced break, it was the only way to mitigate people staying online continuously.

Trying to stop these programs is impossible, you can only hope they do not become widely used by dishonest people. This is why threads and discussions are closed and rightfully so, they only educate dishonest people.

---

Trouble is they will become more and more common and slowly the game will become less and less fun for the guys that don't like to play dishonestly. Then finally the game will be left only for the guys that feel they must break the rules to win, soon after that the game will die.

SC must know this and are probably trying to do everything they can to stop it, which sadly won't amount to much.

Supercell needs to crack down on h@ckers with perm bans and such. Give them a 1 week warning ban first then bring on the hammer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sandiego

If it was discussed more it would be more likely that SC would do something about it. The more complaints they receive about it, the higher priority it would make it for them to stop the cheeting.

---

I am convinced they are very aware of the issue and more threads on the same issue wont help. Also, they do allow the creation of new threads on it, they just dont want more people to learn more about it, so they close the thread after they acknowledge the complaint

that's the thing I really hate about Supercell. They just patch the h a c k s and move on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Benson822175

Umm.. I dont know if we are on the same forum, but SC def is working on it (though new things keep coming up like ghosting/airplane mode)
They dont delete the topics mentioning the problems and release statements about trying to deal with them... seriously... are we even on the same forum or do we have different meanings of the word delete :P

---

How would you know if they delete the topics or not? Is there some place where you can see the history of topics deleted? I've been here long enough and have seen atleast 20 topics about fluffy get deleted, not closed actually deleted. They delete them for a reason because then people like you who didn't see them when they were made believe SC is doing everything fine.

They (SC) deleted my post from yesterday, without letting me know. It was gone when I wanted to check it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZBlacktt

All this [stuff] in CW's has been talked about since the day it came out.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sandiego

The worst part of [this stuff] is SC just removes or closes any discussion of it.
It's a problem thats only growing and they have shown very little reason to believe it will be stopped any time soon.


This is analogous to the NFL banning all talk of steroids

---

Have you ever stopped to consider how these statements are related? There was once a minor problem that existed before Clan Wars that Supercell was working to fix, yet you people have managed to elevate it to epidemic proportions because you can't follow the simple rule of not taking about it. If I said there was a new thread every single day talking about that which shall not be discussed, it would be a gross underestimate. There are multiple every day and it's clear you people aren't going to be satisfied until every single person in the game knows this is out there.

Your comparison would have been more accurate if you said it was analogous to you having the Ebola virus which you then ran door-to-door to tell as many people about as possible, urging them to go out and do the same.