The more GEMS you use, the better chance of BIG loot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Janniboy0312

It's true.

Restarting the game, or setting a new language (which restarts your game too...) puts you in an attacking queue (or whatever it's called) with other people that can attack each other.

Every time the game is restarted, this group changes and the people you're in a group with are different - and might offer more loot.

---

If it is 5PM, then set it to Chinese, and watch those collector raids pile up!:p

statistically speaking, you would encounter more higher loot bases because you are quite simply... Attacking more bases.
if your not gem boosting and you see 2 bases in every 10 that are worth hitting... then when gemming you would see 4 in every 20, but it would seem like more.

I seriously doubt they have written an algorithm into the game to give you better bases when you spend gems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phoenix64

If it is 5PM, then set it to Chinese, and watch those collector raids pile up!:p

---

5pm what time zone? Got any tips?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Concussions

Lol, I don't care if you don't believe me, You can have your horrible days all you want, but I'll always have a good raiding day. So I don't care if you believe me. :)

---

Its not a matter of believing you, its a matter of facts and the fact is changing servers does not give you better loot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DokuganR

Its spelt 'psychological', fyi.

---

It's spelled 'psychological', don't correct others if you don't even know the language yourself lol.

At OP, it sounds really interesting, I'm going check it myself someday. It would make sense if it's true, but it would be really bad if SC kept a secret like this from the players. I don't think it's true though.

I boosted 3 barracks yesterday. Spent the last 35 minutes of those two hours nexting for two attacks. Couldn't even find a decent storage raid for over 200k gold. So, op, I must respectfully disagree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aciros

It's spelled 'psychological', don't correct others if you don't even know the language yourself lol.

At OP, it sounds really interesting, I'm going check it myself someday. It would make sense if it's true, but it would be really bad if SC kept a secret like this from the players. I don't think it's true though.

---

Spelled and spelt are both proper past tense for the verb spell.

I boost something every time i sit down to raid and still get good days and bad so I dont think that theres any truth in this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aciros

It's spelled 'psychological', don't correct others if you don't even know the language yourself lol.

At OP, it sounds really interesting, I'm going check it myself someday. It would make sense if it's true, but it would be really bad if SC kept a secret like this from the players. I don't think it's true though.

---

Actually, in the U.S., 'spelled' is preferred, but in Britain, 'spelt' is more commonly used. Same as burned and burnt.

To OP: I don't think this can be possible. It seems like it would be too complicated of an idea- SC would have to edit the number of inactive bases according to how many barracks you boosted.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pete82

It is selective memory combined with a small sample size.

---

Boom.

10 chars.