With all the great additions to clan wars it would be nice if your clan was getting dominated during a war to be able to have the clan leader forfeit the war. This would allow war to end so clans could move on to start another war.
Printable View
With all the great additions to clan wars it would be nice if your clan was getting dominated during a war to be able to have the clan leader forfeit the war. This would allow war to end so clans could move on to start another war.
No, because then its not fair to the other clan if they want their extra loot but they don't get it.
Agreed. Bad idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClashySquill
It's 1 day long, you really need to forfeit before that?
But a reasonable loot bonus to the winning clan could compensate for that. Forfeited get nothing instead of 20% loot. And eg, 100k/100k extra for the winning clan. There is some merit in the idea, but their needs to be something in it for the winning clan, agreed
Don't think thats a good idea;
Clans would start trolling and forfeiting wars before anyone has even attacked anyone, meaning people cant finish the achievement where u need to get stars in clan wars
Imbalanced wars are one of the rare times you get to make some loot from wars, why would you want to take that away?
If you are on the receiving end, just stop checking the clan wars tab and resume normal clashing.
No, will definitely make the war not fun, some may simply forfeit and pick the new easier opponent, and again..forfeit... endless circle. The way it is, good enough :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Shadow436
Just allow us to copy our redesigned war based to our real based :D
Current match making for clan wars seems to be done on total number of hitponts of all bases so any war should be okay to play as far as Iīm concerned. I have had wars were we thought we were going to be dominated and than just won the battle.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow436
I think the idea would result in kleaders forfeiting a battle because they didnīt like the way the clan donated troops for example, or forfeit if they lost the first bttle, so no, this option should not be implemented if you ask me.
Maybe have an option to surrender once both sides have done a number of attacks and the points difference is over a certain threshold? Otherwise, bad idea.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow436
Only way this would be fair and not abused if:
- The said clan can only surrender when 50% attacks are used.
- There is 4 hours war time left.
I still think this is unfair, unless you allow all the players in the winning team to gain the loot bonus of the top player in the losing clans team.Quote:
Originally Posted by nzxt
When we are sure of the win we barch the top player or snipe the highest player with an exposed town hall.
Being forced to lose this bonus would be very unfair.