Idea of taking any open builders with you into battle to steal your enemy gem boxes and remove trees and brushes in search for GEMS.
Printable View
Idea of taking any open builders with you into battle to steal your enemy gem boxes and remove trees and brushes in search for GEMS.
I think this idea are need improving, i agree the builder and builder hut in war no useful they easy target (there no level up builder hut).
I don't really like this idea. You's have to be on often to check for gem boxes. It's hard enough to get gems without paying, and some people would just revenge a ton to get gems. This could get out of hand and would make the game a little too competitive in my opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by daimond
I agree to both reasons but I don't know where I exactly lean for this idea. There is 1 good reason and 2 bad. (good) you can collect/steal gems from opponents:cool:, (bad1)you can get distracted from actual battle instead trying to get gems, (bad2) What if the builder dies from a cannon or other defense mechanism?….would the builder's hut disappear for that builder at your place?Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbus30
Other than a few other holes, I think this idea is very interesting and would love to see what SuperCell thinks.:o
I'd say no. You have no right to loot someone's gems, they're there for him to take, not you, the same way you have yours. Has been said many times, they can be there for many unfortunate reasons, and gems are not to be played with. Same with trees, some people like to keep Christmas Trees because they like them, who are you to chop them down?
Builders are builders, not fighters, leave them where they belong. This idea is unfair to most of the playerbase in my opinion.
Nah. I dont support this for reasons I will explain. It depends, some people never clear gem boxes. That being said building coming to battle = Unlimited gems.
But!
Maybe if there is a cool down like for a week and a half MAYBE! And you wouldnt be able to stop the cooldown with gems. I still dont know though...
There are so many new players (I won't call them noobs) at low trophies with many obstacles/trees/gem boxes.
This just lets me loot them for my self! YAY ME!
Unbelievably shortsighted idea.
What if loot penalty also applied there? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilISuppose
I would think of it as more difficult, since sc won't make it easy to get more gems.
You could only get some from a th above you (or the same if you're a th 10), and if a builder 'dies' you lose upg time, like 2 hours (2 hours are added to the upgrade.) 2 hours per 3 gems... Mmm? It's risky, but nice :P There'd also be a gem cap per attack. Maybe 2 or 3.
And to avoid th snipers it'd be mandatory to make 50%.
Just an idea
Agree with these, so true besides in the higher levels since building takes so long than if you get a gem box probably will be couple days until you got an available builder so really no point to this, and PhilISuppose was spot on with the comment.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilISuppose
50% isn't going to help, these are TH3-4 bases with loads of obstacles... anyone can easily roll them, even other TH3/4s.Quote:
Originally Posted by bnb525
I bet you would be the first to moan if someone stole your gembox.
I checked ruled out, and it's not...
I stand by my extreme dislike for this idea though.
So an epic battle turns in gardening. Yet one more thread about people playing games for free whilst shamelesly asking for premium features. Oi you, you like playing? Give up one toxic meal you buy from McFatty and buy your gems - you will leave longer ans the rest of us wont waste time reading stupid threads.
Taking loot from your opponent is enough, not to mention trophies.. now they have to defend their gems? Come on now.. -.-
Wow!!! lot of negative thoughts. Guess I was just thinking if you played the game alot and not just sign up and play once a week. Its one way to earn extra gems instead of paying for them. And it would just change up everyones strategy to make sure they didn't losse gems just like there coins and elixir.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildchild
I do play a lot? It's one way to earn extra gems, and to lose them. The only thing in this game you can't lose to an opponent, is gems, why not leave it that way?
Sub-200 farming would be up like crazy! Find those new bases that don't know how to clear yet and get 100 gems a raid.
You must be crazy! Haha!
Very exploitable, would rate 0 star if it was possible. Pretty much unlimited gems with so much abandoned bases.
I think this is ruled out and if it is, good, i think its a terrible idea anyway