Use some real arguments, guys.
It's sad how bad the arguments are for both sides. But especially the side against a hog nerf. Seriously, if you are going to argue that hogs are fine (and there are certainly points you can bring up to defend this), don't use these stupid arguments with faulty logic:
1. "They were nerfed twice already. Deal with it." This logic is stupid as hell. It doesn't matter what the unit was like in the past. If the previous nerfs were a dark elixir cost increase by 1 and an increase in training time by 1 second, would this argument hold? No, of course not. What matters is the state of the troop right now.
2. "Use them yourself." So if supercell released a spell with a 30 minute train time and 2,000 dark elixir that instantly flattened a base if used on the exact center tile, would you still just say "use it yourself?" Hopefully not, as this fixes nothing and just perpetuates the imbalance. Also, stop assuming that anyone who wants to nerf hogs doesn't already use them himself. I use them all the time. Still doesn't change the fact that they are overpowered.
3. "You got destroyed by hogs. Move on." Similar to the case above. If this mindset were employed nothing would ever be fixed and we might as well give hogs 100000 hitpoints.
TL;DR come up with better arguments than "deal with it," "they were already nerfed," and "use them yourself"
That's all for my rant. Now someone can tell me that there is not an imbalance when we have multitudes of bases th9 and below designed specifically around a single unit because you are screwed otherwise.
