Hey there.
I am a big user of BArch, but I use a variation of it (giants + wb's). I am wondering how big of a role barbs are compared to giants. Which is better for my army?
Printable View
Hey there.
I am a big user of BArch, but I use a variation of it (giants + wb's). I am wondering how big of a role barbs are compared to giants. Which is better for my army?
Both upgrades are a pretty big boost, but since you are a BARCHer you might want to do barbs unless you change your strategy.
Giants attack fairly slowly, are slower, more expensive, and take up more room in the army camp!!!!!!!! Barbs are a better choice in my opinion. They don't need the Hit Points if they have the numbers
I agree with zani. And while barbs are upgrading you will have plenty of time to save for giantsQuote:
Originally Posted by Zanzibar
If you're barching with giants I would obviously do the barbarians. You can't using that many giants compared to the 50+ barbs I'm assuming you're using. Combined with the BK's ability and a rage spell or two DEFF. the barbs. Giants l6 are deff more worth it if you're just using the giants themselves or some type of attack method which the majority of your troops are giants.
I prefer Barbarians LV6. They are more versatile and are basically like "mini-giants" that are a dual threat instead of just a single threat like the giants.
Barbarians. Since You're A BArcher.
Giants Take More Space And They Are Way Slower.
And The BK's Abilty Would Crush A Base With Your Lvl 6 Barbarians.;)
I find barbarians still die fairly easily if you run into any base with Xbows, so I prefer to use giants. But I see tons of people using lvl6 barbarians while farming, so probably just a coin flip. If you BARCH though I'd go with barbarians.
I prefer watching a horde of barbs rip through a base then big lumbering giants get flung by spring traps :rolleyes:
Just save up for one while u upgrade the other. It does not really matter in the long run