Add a "Last" button in Find a Match screen.

I suggest that we should add a "Last" button in the "Find a Match" screen near the "Next" button.

So that we can:

• Have a change go back to the last found result when we click the next button too fast (this happens too much...:().
• Have a extra change to find a better match if we have a good (but not good enough) one.

Update:

Limitation only one step you can do the "Last" action.

Quote:

---

Eg, I search bases a b c, c is the current base i got, i can tap "last" to go back to b, and the "last" button disappears. then i tap "next" i got d the "last" button is still not displayed because i have already
go back to b and no more change to go back to b again. then i tap "next" again i got e. the last base is d now and i have never go back to there, so the "last" show again.

---

so the rule is:

1. The "last" buttons shows only if you have a last base and you have never go back to that base.
2. And when the "last" button tapped, the history is gone, you have to start from the scratch (tap 2 times "next" to see the "last" button).
3. The study time: when you tap "next" the time have N seconds left for base X, the you tap "last" in the next base Y, and go back to base X, you got time count from N, not 30s.


http://i.imgur.com/RGZwM6g.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xpol

I suggest that we should add a "Last" button in the "Find a Match" screen near the "Next" button.

So that we can:

• Have a change go back to the last found result when we click the next button too fast (this happens too much...:().
• Have a extra change to find a better match if we have a good (but not good enough) one.

http://i.imgur.com/RGZwM6g.png

---

If this was implemented, I belive the cost of the last button should 2000+ coins. Having it the same price as the next button doesn't make sence

Good idea. I just hate it when I accidentally skip a couple of nice bases...
This solves it :)

very very very good idea!
I was wrong to click many times and I went ahead without meaning :D
excuse me for my bad english but i'm italian :)

I think it is ruled out but anyway it can be abused a bit all you do you find a base you want to atk and you study it if the 30 seconds is not enough they can click next than back and get infinite time to study the base

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jackspick

I think it is ruled out but anyway it can be abused a bit all you do you find a base you want to atk and you study it if the 30 seconds is not enough they can click next than back and get infinite time to study the base

---

Very correct. This would be cool for starters but yes, It would abused because of the way people could look at someone's base.

I think you should only be able to go to that base once

This might work if the last button can only be used once. When you press next again, you can't go back again. And the last button definitely needs to be raised in price.

This essentially gives anyone 60 seconds to study a base instead of 30, which I think is too much time.

For that reason alone, I don't think this suggestion is necessary.

If you click next too fast accidentally, that should be a lesson learned to be a bit more careful in the future. I feel that Supercell shouldn't have to change this aspect of the game to accommodate your impatience.

The suggestions that this can only be used once against the same base and that it must cost much more than the nexting cost is at least a step in the right direction, but still, I think the way the matchmaking works now is just fine.

What if when you go back, you have the same amount of studying time as you did when you left it. That way, there is no way to extend the study time, but you still get the benefit of the last button.