Printable View
An idea that could prove useful.
However, there is a possibility of abuse by the leader/coleads where they are able to stop even active members from requesting donations. Could be useful as a punishment of sort but bear in mind that not all leaders or co leaders are responsible people.
Requests and donation should be as normal, but if that's the case, an opt-out/opt-in option would be better suited.
Tagging inactive members should best be done by themselves IMO.
I agree that you don't want to kick loyal players just because they aren't able to play for a short period if time. I also believe you shouldn't be able to only expose your stronger clan members to a war - things would get boring. Maybe there should be a way to flag a certain number of members (10% of clan size) that will be ignored when the war members are determined. Clan leader manages the ignore flags so has to choose to ignore idle players or weaker players. If a member leaves the clan so that the clan size drops an ignore flag ie 40 (4 flags) to 39 (3 flags) then the lowest trophied member with a flag loses it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redfordb
That's something I didn't think of. You're absolutely right, it would get boring to have only the strongest members in wars, thus there should be some limit of either inactive members or minimum number of players required to start a war. I'll add this to the topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SargeantZeal
Humm, don't you think the clans with no responsible leaders should just be doomed to death? We really don't need to start thinking of those clans nor taking care of them, at all. If the leader, whom also found the clan is not responsible, then it's his own fault the clan fails and so be it. As for the members, I believe they are not very happy to be in such clan, so they might as well just change the clan.
I agree to this idea about marking one as inactive but the idea of inactive member cant request for cc to defend his/her loot while they stay less online is absurd.. rest is good and required. About personal issue terms or whatever its ruled out for is lame caz what about clan's personal requirement.. seriously?? for the sake of few inactive while rest of the clan suffers.. so satisfying few inactive is not so cool reason to rule this idea out.. plus i believe supercell should also check the voting if available to similar ideas.. am sure most of the people supported this idea..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storyteller
Nobody would like to stay in such clan.. its better that one finds a better clan with a better clan leader.. a very simple yet practical solution to your query.. that way clan leader wont abuse their privilege as well..
Guess you're right about the requesting troops thingy being disabled to be a bad idea. I'll consider removing it from the thread. And thanks for the support as well :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Thoxx
Up to the top, keep voting :)
I don't get how it's being abused?Quote:
Originally Posted by dominic115
There are lots of clans already at the moment who have players leave (or get kicked) just prior to starting a war.
Players who:
Aren't very active
Aren't good at clan wars
Don't want to do clan wars
Will be away for the next couple of days.
It means you end up with a 25 vs 25 where your 25 people all actively want to be a part of the war.
This would just make it an easier way to do the same thing.
For me I think there should be TWO flags. That a Leader can flag someone as not for war, and that a member can do so as well.
I thought about something similar.
My thought was adding "troop" to the clan ranks. So it would go something like:
member, troop, elder, co-leader, leader
members would not be eligible for wars
troops and above are war eligible
Also to lessen clan hopping, all members "pay" a "tax" to the clan for every multiplayer win. It goes into a pot and is distributed as part of the loot. That way leaders can choose to make members earn their way into wars, and demote troops to members after unsuccessful wars.
I think it's ok if only the top players are active, as long as the match making ai pairs those top players against an evenly matched group of player in another clan.
Thanks for the support guys