Leader (or co-leader) to nominate who goes to war..!

I've thought about this too. I think the public/private setting should be the determining factor whether this option should exist or not. In a public clan it's the responsibility of clan leaders to maintain activity of its members. It is more likely in a public clan that the members are unrelated and can't contact each other outside the game, so to coordinate who will be available for war (say participation is at the discretion of the members via a button) would be near impossible (scheduling and time zones and all). If it's at the discretion of the leaders some members would be intentionally left out. But with a clan set to private, there's probably more communication between members. In that case (a private clan i.e. invite only)this feature would be awesome! It would allow a clan to be way mor efficient. But that brings up the question of whether public clans should even battle public ones. Ultimately because private clans would have the potential to put their best war inclined players first, putting them at greater advantage. Thoughts?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tmiles

I've thought about this too. I think the public/private setting should be the determining factor whether this option should exist or not. In a public clan it's the responsibility of clan leaders to maintain activity of its members. It is more likely in a public clan that the members are unrelated and can't contact each other outside the game, so to coordinate who will be available for war (say participation is at the discretion of the members via a button) would be near impossible (scheduling and time zones and all). If it's at the discretion of the leaders some members would be intentionally left out. But with a clan set to private, there's probably more communication between members. In that case (a private clan i.e. invite only)this feature would be awesome! It would allow a clan to be way mor efficient. But that brings up the question of whether public clans should even battle public ones. Ultimately because private clans would have the potential to put their best war inclined players first, putting them at greater advantage. Thoughts?

---

Would it matter if they put their best players in first? Thats where the match-making comes into its own, yes?

Yes that's true it doesn't really make a difference if they put their best first. But the criteria for matching clans would have to be way more accurate than matching trophies or experience points. I have no idea what their criteria is and haven't gotten a clear answer on that. But almost every war I've been in (about 15) one clan is totally out-classed by the other. If it wasn't for the variations in participation it would be the rest of the journey towards completely unfair.

Well, looks like my opinion has been accepted! lol
Hurray~~~~

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kppoy236

Well, looks like my opinion has been accepted! lol
Hurray~~~~

---

Congrats! Your suggestion was accepted :D