Clan War looting system

nonono! the reason why people 3 star is to win. If you win, you can actually get all of your loot bonus. Therefore, you WANT to 3 star them. 1 Star does give you loot, but doesnt mean that you would win and get it. This encourages attackers to actually go for the best they can to ensure a victory and get all of the war loot.

Should be option 1 depends on the amount you destroyed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AngryAngels

Yes, the only thing that makes you want more stars .. is to win the war, you're right. My thread is about the fairness between players in the clan. Does the actual looting system push doing more stars and win the war .. not it do not.

- A player that attack a village knowing he will only do one star, 250k of loot
- A player that attack a smaller village (just under the previous), and got three stars, 220k of loot

The first one will get a bigger loot ... is it fair ? Is this system rewarding the best dude ... nope, does it push people of doing more stars and win the war.... no, because one star is enought. :rolleyes:

- Worst, a player that attack a village that already have been exploded with 3 stars and only do one star ... GET the full loot. :confused:

For the time being, the only thing to do ... educate players and kick the ones that do not play it right... well, i prefer having fun than playing the policeman in the clan. I do not like seeing gentle players that do everything to win the war being outrace (loot speaking) by players that do everything to win more loot.... i feel bad for them.

---

I understand the argument. I don't agree with it though.

If you prefer having fun, then quit worrying about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hettoman2

I do understand where your coming from and it is a valid idea, but the range of players who participate in clan wars spreads from town hall 10's down to little nooby town halls with like 2 cannons and a mortar.

Your idea could be an effective system for the th7 to th9 range where any decent player would have full capability of 3 starring a retrospective base, but what about the th10's who struggle to get a 2 star on other th10 bases and the lower th levels who have never even gotten a 3 star in their life.

Easy loot is one of the main incentives for many players to do clan wars and if you took this away participation numbers could drop. Or the whole mechanism could be ruined beacause players would just attack much lower bases they know they can 3 star, taking away the opportunity for the lowest players to participate.

---

Good point on your last paragraph... the mecanism perhaps rely on "Easy loot"... unfair, but certainly a reality. Well it's already like that in life .. :D
I'm TH8 near fully upgraded, i don't really know about TH10's life... but i think the matchmarking is there to "choose" the proper clan. Doing two stars on an other TH10 would means : at least 50% destruction + TH, that's between 51% destruction and 99% ... right .. with my system would be awarded between 51% and 99% of the full loot... pretty cool ... no ? :p
We got two low levels and the only time they've done a star is when they attacked an outside TH. They could easily have destroyed the two lower ennemy villages... but the outside TH have more loot..... They attacked the same biggest village and both does one star, resulting in only one star for the war, of course they got the full loot. They could have done 6 stars (three for each low villages) and help us win the war.

I'm filling 80% of the war requests (only two of us got the best troops) and i do not care about elixir cause i got more than i can use. I just feel the unfairness for some of our players which works hard to win and get less than some others. Well as i said ... kicking is the only solution actually.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oymoy

I posted my idea there.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...efending/page4

---

Cool idea, i think yours and mine are complementary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

I understand the argument. I don't agree with it though.

If you prefer having fun, then quit worrying about it.

---

Yeah, good point, but it can't work like that, i'm worried about the pleasure of players in the clan. For me precisely, i do not care since i got 3 stars 90% of the time with my recomended target, plus the loot is peanut for me... i'm feeding 80% of the war requests.
I just do not want some of our players to feel spoiled.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nvk518

nonono! the reason why people 3 star is to win. If you win, you can actually get all of your loot bonus. Therefore, you WANT to 3 star them. 1 Star does give you loot, but doesnt mean that you would win and get it. This encourages attackers to actually go for the best they can to ensure a victory and get all of the war loot.

---

Not right, got many experiences that prove the opposite. You're right, winning the war push people to do more stars... BUT some of them prefer winning loot by thinking their stars will not be needed... then sometimes, but only sometimes. we loose cause we're missing two or three stars...

I do not like the idea by percentage unless the max is higher then current. Sometimes you might get 95% or 99% because there is some stupid building in the corner and troops think the best thing to do is hit walls rather go around them, likewise, it is not the game's fault people are stupid and leave the TH out to encourage this behavior to begin with.

Also I fear getting three stars for more loot then two would make people want to target lower then their level too much.

I like your idea but with a little twist:

1 star = 100% of the loot bonus
2 stars = 150%
3 stars = 200%

Hahahaa i know its a lot to ask, but that would help a LOT, and it will actually give the players motivation to always 3 star a base. What do you guys think it should be the percentage??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by skullx28

Im a th9 lvl94 and I have interesting question kinda relating to this topic
What happens when u have war loot in ur cc but u have almost storages then press collect is the rest stored in the cc or does it aol go into the storages? Thx in advance if u answer this question

---

It's exactly like a mine etc.
Any loot that doesn't fit in a storage stays in your clan castle.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cnascime

I like your idea but with a little twist:

1 star = 100% of the loot bonus
2 stars = 150%
3 stars = 200%

Hahahaa i know its a lot to ask, but that would help a LOT, and it will actually give the players motivation to always 3 star a base. What do you guys think it should be the percentage??

---

A;ready said the problem with that.

Quote:

---

Also I fear getting three stars for more loot then two would make people want to target lower then their level too much.

---

So maybe they could lower the loot bonus for those who attack somebody below their recommended target

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cnascime

So maybe they could lower the loot bonus for those who attack somebody below their recommended target

---

I agree, I think it should be based more on attacking above or below your level, right now everyone sees the same bonus.

However what happens when your recommended target is below your level from anyone around your level being stared already? (I had this happened and I noticed .. um I think their forth highest it was, was not even stared so I attacked that and got two stars, someone WAY above my recommended) The person was a somewhat high town hall eight and my recomdned was a high seven.