Im appaled

I just read a thread and heard that a co-leader changed a clan description to something vulgar. Then the leader got banned for this (24 hour ban). How in the world does this happen. Supercell if this is true, it must be fixed because people could use this while the leader is sleeping t get him banned. Dont give me creep like 'Promote people you trust, because people might be good for months and then backstab you. Also a comment like "Dont promote anyone is also bullcrap. Yes that would be a fix, but not a good one. Again thus did not happen to me, Im arguing for the poor victim.

Opinions or thoughts anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

I just read a thread and heard that a co-leader changed a clan description to something vulgar. Then the leader got banned for this (24 hour ban). How in the world does this happen. Supercell if this is true, it must be fixed because people could use this while the leader is sleeping t get him banned. Dont give me creep like 'Promote people you trust, because people might be good for months and then backstab you. Also a comment like "Dont promote anyone is also bullcrap. Yes that would be a fix, but not a good one. Again thus did not happen to me, Im arguing for the poor victim.

Opinions or thoughts anyone?

---

I see two options:
1) Promote people you trust
2) Dont promote anyone

I know your making a joke, but this is serious bro, as a leader this is a big deal to me. Im sure many leaders would agree.

I'm apalled at your spelling of apalled.


Just kidding, but yea I saw that thread and it did worry me slightly. I have 2 Co-Leaders that I trust well, but in the event that something happens to their device or they decide to backstab, what do I do about it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bhima

I see two options:
1) Promote people you trust
2) Dont promote anyone

---

ahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahha

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dragonx10101

I'm apalled at your spelling of apalled.


Just kidding, but yea I saw that thread and it did worry me slightly. I have 2 Co-Leaders that I trust well, but in the event that something happens to their device or they decide to backstab, what do I do about it?

---

Supercell with their 2 Billion DOLARS should spend some money on who actually did what, not just assuming it was the leader.

In the end the leader is the responsible one of his clan. If you do not want the responsibility, step down from the leadership role. Also it was a 24 hour ban so not a major thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glaciesvir

In the end the leader is the responsible one of his clan. If you do not want the responsibility, step down from the leadership role. Also it was a 24 hour ban so not a major thing.

---

2 of those are Thats a permanent ban. the leader is responsible for what someone else does.. Come on this is not a Court case thats ♥♥.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

I know your making a joke, but this is serious bro, as a leader this is a big deal to me. Im sure many leaders would agree.

---

It is difficult to take you seriously with so many typos, including both words in the title of the thread (Im [sic] appaled [sic]).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bhima

It is difficult to take you seriously with so many typos, including both words in the title of the thread (Im [sic] appaled [sic]).

---

Honestly Your gonna say that cause I did not add a comma to Im. Honestly what wrong with you people.

Blake - it's up to the leader to decide who he/she want's to give the ability to change the clan message to, they need to be accountable for their actions.

Who knew anyway it might have been the leader who changed it, or it may not - either way there are terms of conditions to play this game and if people break them then it is only right they face the consequences.

I have been the brunt of people creating "I hate Daddy" clans or putting highly offensive things in their clan descriptions aimed at me - it is nasty and needs to be dealt with objectively by Supercell Support.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

Honestly Your gonna say that cause I did not add a comma to Im. Honestly what wrong with you people.

---

You must be new to forums if you thought you would receive much empathy here. Most people are just here to troll and steer topics off the point.

Sorry for your friends situation but sadly there is not much to be done the way the leader/co is set up. I guess us leaders just have to hope our trust in co-leaders is valid. I trust mine completely so hopefully that's enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daddy

Blake - it's up to the leader to decide who he/she want's to give the ability to change the clan message to, they need to be accountable for their actions.

Who knew anyway it might have been the leader who changed it, or it may not - either way there are terms of conditions to play this game and if people break them then it is only right they face the consequences.

I have been the brunt of people creating "I hate Daddy" clans or putting highly offensive things in their clan descriptions aimed at me - it is nasty and needs to be dealt with objectively by Supercell Support.

---

You are right It is up to the leader. Im sure you are a co-leader of a clan, and if you wanted to turn against your leader you could. Of course you would not but it's very easy. What your saying to completely eliminate this is to not promote anyone to co leader. Is this correct?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

Honestly Your gonna say that cause I did not add a comma to Im. Honestly what wrong with you people.

---

Not to be that guy, but that "comma" is actually an apostrophe... :)

The leader is responsible for those underneath him. If he cannot trust those he has entrusted with his clan doing so is at his own peril. The clan in question, you and others have been taught a lesson in ownership and responsibility. Luckily the only price paid was a forced vacation from CoC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pain462

Not to be that guy, but that "comma" is actually an apostrophe... :)

---

Forget the forums if this is how people are thats just being rude. The forums use to be not full of trolls, but now people just steer the topic somewhere irrelevant. (Did I spell that right)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coathanger

The leader is responsible for those underneath him. If he cannot trust those he has entrusted with his clan doing so is at his own peril. The clan in question, you and others have been taught a lesson in ownership and responsibility. Luckily the only price paid was a forced vacation from CoC.

---

What if you completely Trusted someone and they turned on you. How would you feel. AGAIN IM NOT DEFENDING MYSELF, but the many leaders out there and the person that this actually happened too. I'm (see the APOSTROPHE) just mad at his Supercell has no data of who changed the clan message.

I guess i'm saying what is a "cheeky message" to one person might be something quite different to another and support need to be able to make their own decisions when arbitrating on these issues, they have access to information that you will not see in game - past warning history etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

You are right It is up to the leader. Im sure you are a co-leader of a clan, and if you wanted to turn against your leader you could. Of course you would not but it's very easy. What your saying to completely eliminate this is to not promote anyone to co leader. Is this correct?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daddy

I guess i'm saying what is a "cheeky message" to one person might be something quite different to another and support need to be able to make their own decisions when arbitrating on these issues, they have access to information that you will not see in game - past warning history etc.

---

Im really confused.Are you saying that The people that decide what is bad and what is okay do have access to Who changed the clan message.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

What if you completely Trusted someone and they turned on you. How would you feel. AGAIN IM NOT DEFENDING MYSELF, but the many leaders out there and the person that this actually happened too. I'm (see the APOSTROPHE) just mad at his Supercell has no data of who changed the clan message.

---

BTDT it sucks!

SC knows who is leader and he/she is ultimately responsible.
SC apparently wants to slow down the cyber trolling/bullying in it's game. They are sending a message that such actions are the responsibility of the clan leadership and also if it continues the clan as a whole will be punished for supporting those ideas.

You can argue till your blue in the face but SC is sending a clear message. Stop being nasty to others with your clan descriptions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coathanger

BTDT it sucks!

SC knows who is leader and he/she is ultimately responsible.
SC apparently wants to slow down the cyber trolling/bullying in it's game. They are sending a message that such actions are the responsibility of the clan leadership and also if it continues the clan as a whole will be punished for supporting those ideas.

You can argue till you blue in the face but SC is sending a clear message. Stop being nasty to others with your clan descriptions.

---

Im not the one that was banned or the one who created a bad clan description. No idea where you are getting that from. What I am asking is why Supercell cant monitor who changed the clan description. Why is this hard to understand. I have an idea instead of being a grammar nazi, try and read the Post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blakescool

Im not the one that was banned or the one who created a bad clan description. No idea where you are getting that from. What I am asking is why Supercell cant monitor who changed the clan description. Why is this hard to understand. I have an idea instead of being a grammar nazi, try and read the Post.

---

What has happened to the forums, over the last few days people have started calling everyone who disagrees with them a nazi.

there really is nothing the leader can do. theres a famous saying "the buck stops here". any leader of a nation is automatically responsible for the actions of those that represent him.

the only difference here is maybe sc can simply see who changed the message, which Is not possible in real life.


on the same topic, I heard of an entire clan being banned for 24 hours for the message. this I think is truly unfair.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shlomie

there really is nothing the leader can do. theres a famous saying "the buck stops here". any leader of a nation is automatically responsible for the actions of those that represent him.

the only difference here is maybe sc can simply see who changed the message, which Is not possible in real life.


on the same topic, I heard of an entire clan being banned for 24 hours for the message. this I think is truly unfair.

---

It was plural, messages, meaning it was over a prolonged period of time with warnings given and not a one time occurrence.
just thought I should give a brief history before that blows up the thread.

I am willing to wager, that clan wishes the leader alone was banned when it first started occurring as it likely would not have escalated to where it ultimately required the clan be punished for repeated harassment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nmills

What has happened to the forums, over the last few days people have started calling everyone who disagrees with them a nazi.

---

I guess u never heard if the grammar nazi. Btw another off topic post from someone lol