Clan Wars FEEDBACK here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IcelandGold

In my opion Clan Wars have ruend the game for farmers.(Includeing me.)Since im a farmer i cant 3 star bases. So i use all in drag raids. 500k 2 raids . And i hardly have time any more to play this game so Clan wars takes all the time .I was down to 10k elixir at one point. So i was forced to take a break from my clan.

Members of my clan have been rageing from the clan or even the game. If we dont get a fix for thad soon , allot of players are gona quit.

On and off buttun for if you wanna play in Clan wars maybe

Ice. Sorry for missspeeling if there is some

---

Meanwhile, it would be wise to find and stay in a farming clan that does not or seldom goes into wars. In a way, this Clan Wars update has forced players to recognise if their clans really suit their goals and styles of play.

For our clan, we compromised with the less keen team mates by reducing the number of wars per week, and allow them to leave the clan temporarily before we perform the matchmaking. Of course, a new feature for Opt-In/Out would be welcomed but before that becomes a reality, we will have to do it this way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MomoZB

I will bet you everything I own it will happen on a mass scale (kicking people so they get no loot) if the idea was put though and I am sure the situation you are saying wont happen will. Like I said it is the internet and most things hardly make sense here in someone's actions.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by magnor

I agree that my scenario would in no way be as common as sniping ( I think I may have mentioned). Sorry. It was just a scenario that came to my head while reading the posts, not something I had put a lot of thought into. That being said, do you think that there are no elders, coleaders or anyone with the ability to kick, who would think it a laugh to kick out a lowly member because,let's say, they raided an opponent , say, that the elder had put "dibs" on four hours earlier (probably while the poor member was sleeping). I'm sorry, but to say that the scenario of kicking any player just so that they don't get a loot bonus doesn't make sense and probably won't hapoen is a bit naive. Trolls will always find a way in the game play to upset other players because that's the way they are. Changing the game play needs to do more than just change the problem.

---

I agree, but what I'm also saying is, these immature players we are talking about will still kick other members without a reason regardless of clan wars or not and the abbility to kick other players so they don't get any loot in clan wars will not make trolls out of reasonable, "normal" players, so it does not really make a difference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daz258

It has been over a month since this update, is there an update around the corner to address a number of the issues surrounding Clan Wars?

It's great to play, but there are a lot of issues holding it back, many of which are listed in the original post of this thread.

---

I think many of us are looking for an update with some direction for the update coming. There are numerous items addressed, and really anxious on which of them have been addressed, such as a village save option for CW, etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MarcusFishie

The biggest topic being talked about in our clan is the loot and rewards from clan wars. We love clan wars though they are a resource drain and we spend most of our time farming over waring. We had some thoughts that might make Clan Wars more enticing to farmers and other clans.

First a loot boost based on your win loss record. Say your 10-0 you get a 10% bonus on loot from that war. If your 5-5you get 5% for wining that war. Something around that. We would like to see large loot totals for those that put the effort forward.

Second a Clan war trophy league, just like the Individual league. Every win creates a cumulative trophy for that war and each clan gets those towards their rankings, Their ranking then adds a bonus loot right to your Storage containers.

Thirds more gem achievements! Do a 3 win star achievement 10 wins for 5 gems, 100 wins 50 gems and 100 wins for 500 gems. This also would care from clan to clan so if you leave you only get the wins you have earned not the clans(clan based but individually earned. This would prevent clan jumping) In stride with that a cumulative win-gem reward. 5 wins-1 gem, then for Evey 5 wins- extra gems! If you leave the clan or loose you start over.

Forth special gem boxes for earning 3 and 6 stars and a small gem box for all the members in the winning clan!

---

Additions:
We should have the option of waring more than one clan! Do a triple or quad war. Each clan added to your war addeds one extra attack! This would really make war exciting as you would have to be fast on waring to get max stars to win war. then boost rewards would be 100% for winners, 75% second place, 50% for third and 25% for last.

There also seems to be an over talk about traitors. keep it simple. If thry are not in line with your rules boot them. not syre why this is taking up so much of this thread!


These are just some simple thoughts from;
Jadorian (Jado)
Clan -Hand ofthe Lord![/QUOTE]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superclash99

I agree, but what I'm also saying is, these immature players we are talking about will still kick other members without a reason regardless of clan wars or not and the abbility to kick other players so they don't get any loot in clan wars will not make trolls out of reasonable, "normal" players, so it does not really make a difference.

---

They can and will if person in question gives a reason too, or if the leader is having a bad day and kicks the other for a pushing button, even if for the most part that person is "Normal"

There is some meme out there that explains it but it has a sotra curse word in there so i doono if it is a good idea to link it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daz258

It has been over a month since this update, is there an update around the corner to address a number of the issues surrounding Clan Wars?

It's great to play, but there are a lot of issues holding it back, many of which are listed in the original post of this thread.

---

This, can we get some information regarding what is planned to be changed and when?

Also can it be explained what this hardcore issue is? Because you do get messages in the game who donates what in normal play and if someone repeatedly donates bad troops we kick them. If they have low donation count we kick them so I do not understand why clan wars allows donation trolling and allows people get away with it:
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...X-THIS-FAST-SC

I was talking to a friend, and he offered a neat suggestion - make it so that, of your two attacks, one of them must be against your ranked counterpart. So for instance, the #1 guy in your clan has to attack the #1 guy in their clan, and then he gets one other attack to use against anyone else.I thought this was a pretty cool idea; it sets up a 'rivalry' attack and counter-attack between your equal. It also makes it so that (probably) everyone is going to get attacked at least once; as it is now, I go most wars without ever being attacked, along with most of our other top bases with good layouts. And because there's still the second attack, it makes it so that it shouldn't be too much of an issue if one person really screws up their rival attack, or if someone is AFK for a clan war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PetPet

I was talking to a friend, and he offered a neat suggestion - make it so that, of your two attacks, one of them must be against your ranked counterpart. So for instance, the #1 guy in your clan has to attack the #1 guy in their clan, and then he gets one other attack to use against anyone else.I thought this was a pretty cool idea; it sets up a 'rivalry' attack and counter-attack between your equal. It also makes it so that (probably) everyone is going to get attacked at least once; as it is now, I go most wars without ever being attacked, along with most of our other top bases with good layouts. And because there's still the second attack, it makes it so that it shouldn't be too much of an issue if one person really screws up their rival attack, or if someone is AFK for a clan war.

---

I do not like this. As a middle player I frequently two or three stars people above that. Plus it moves depending on stars so if I attack late it might give me something way to weak or strong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MomoZB

I do not like this. As a middle player I frequently two or three stars people above that. Plus it moves depending on stars so if I attack late it might give me something way to weak or strong.

---

Well, you still get one attack to choose whoever you want; someone strong or someone weak. I don't think I understand your second sentence though? It seems like you're referring to the 'recommended target' thing, which isn't your equivalent on the other side of the clan war. Typically the 'recommended target' is much weaker relative to your own standing in the war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MomoZB

They can and will if person in question gives a reason too, or if the leader is having a bad day and kicks the other for a pushing button, even if for the most part that person is "Normal"

---

Well, if the person gives a reason to get kicked, he then deserved the kick, if the leader is having a bad day and kicks without a reason, then a clan with such a leader is not worth it staying in and the person that got kicked is better off in another clan anyway. No problem at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PetPet

I was talking to a friend, and he offered a neat suggestion - make it so that, of your two attacks, one of them must be against your ranked counterpart. So for instance, the #1 guy in your clan has to attack the #1 guy in their clan, and then he gets one other attack to use against anyone else.I thought this was a pretty cool idea; it sets up a 'rivalry' attack and counter-attack between your equal. It also makes it so that (probably) everyone is going to get attacked at least once; as it is now, I go most wars without ever being attacked, along with most of our other top bases with good layouts. And because there's still the second attack, it makes it so that it shouldn't be too much of an issue if one person really screws up their rival attack, or if someone is AFK for a clan war.

---

Forget it, if people are already complaining about unfair matches (which I've also had, but I understand it can be tricky to find the perfect opponent and allegedly it will get better) imagine the tons of complaint threads about "unfair direct opponents".

BUT, if the match making was 100% perfect (i don't think it will ever be, though) I don't find this is a bad idea.