More democratic clans: Should we be able to vote to demote a bad leader?
I was readind the "Clan mail cool down" thread, and a moderator said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
twister
Each leader and co-leader can send one message per 12 hours. You get too many messages, your attack and defense log/replays will disappear (attack/defense/mail) share a space limit right now, so you don't want too many messages.
And some guy answered this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DidIDoThat
I think the cool down is ridiculous. If you don't like how many messages the leader is sending then you're in the wrong clan.
Come to think of it...
What happens when you are in a good clan, you get along with your clan mates, but you have a bad leader? Maybe the leader is a dictator, or rude, or doesn't know who to run a clan, or he's never online...
Shouldn't we be able to vote to demote a bad leader? If 90% of the clan members vote, the leader is automatically demoted and the best ranked player is promoted to leadership (same way if a leader leaves the clan) (90% to prevent abuse)
This probably will never happen because it requires a lot of coding and there's more important thing to fix, but it would be an interesting debate! (So please don't move to ideas/suggestions)
What do you think?