Printable View
piggy backing on the bender of zombies, i think the wall breaker targets first and path finds second, or at least that is how it looks based upon your screen shot.
when you dropped the little guy he picked out the wall in front of that storage because it was the wall piece that was closest to a "trapped" building from it's current position. it then picked a path to get there.
i'll see if i can test this theory out or if it will turn out to be noise instead of signal.
intresting! I'll try that!Quote:
Originally Posted by Junliang
@HannibalQuote:
Originally Posted by Hannibal
thanks. try and re-try til we have a proper defence.
That sort of defence seems unreliable and based off mistakes made by the attacker..Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibal
but maybe you have a more complex design then we await your good news :)
Great job Junliang! Nice informative thread, I don't think anyone has an excuse of not knowing using the wbs after reading this hahaha.
Hey sup wolfz :DQuote:
Originally Posted by wolfz
Nice of you to drop by :)
Thanks for the kind words :o
Oh well, the learning curve for the new wb can be quite steep for certain players, I don't blame them haha, just hope they atleast attempt to learn first before complaining, the community would be grateful haha
Attachment 4507I wonder how would WB react to this layout.
http://forum.supercell.net/attachmen...7&d=1363332443Quote:
Originally Posted by akshea
Wall Breakers deployed in the middle of the strips outside will blast a hole in the middle of the strip.
Wall breakers deployed at the side of the strips will walk around it and blast the compartment in the middle.
Those 3 walls spikes at the North-east side is redundant
my 2 cents
How and where would you attack this base with new wb?Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyrose
http://i1188.photobucket.com/albums/...ps0974b3d9.jpg
Does anyone know why WBs continue to widen the gap at the first layer walls? Happen to me 4-5 times now.
As you can see, I usually bring around 10-12 wallbreakers with me and I deployed two of them per set. The first set dig the hole on the first layer but then the 2nd set and 3rd set go to left and right and widen the gap on the first wall layer. There is no comparment there to attract the following sets. The 4th set still widen the gap even more and finally Finally, I can get to the second layer with my 5th set.
Well, does it mean now we have force to take all building at the first layer in order to reach the second one (even if there is no nearer compartment)? That's plain stupid. No problem for weak base but imagine there are lv7 mortars and xbows (lv1-3) behind the second layer wall. Those things will kill your troops if you dont reach second layer fast enough. (Im Townhall 9 and now with the new update I can get 100% root only from TH 9 with usually have 2 xbows behind the 2nd or 3rd layer walls. BTW, Im not premature TH9.)
Sincerely, I hate new WB. I have to use them more than ever before and they also take 2 spaces now. Doesnt mean that I didnt try to learn and use them. I understand the concept and basic of their AI now but the problem above still happen. (Which according to their AI, they shouldn't do that)
Also, with new AI we have to destroy any nearer single useless compartment before we can go for the 2nd layer or even worse the 3rd layer. That's almost impossible to reach the deep side of the base with really strong defense (LV 70-80+) before your troops were killed.
New WB AI does a lot better against some types of bases but do worse against another certain types of bases. The increasing splash radious is great for offense, bad for defense but I generally think the AI of WB is worse and it take 2 space camps now.