Possible Inferno FIX

Printable View

March 21st, 2014
Siddmaster

Possible Inferno FIX

Well, here is my inferno fix. Some of you (all of you) are probably laughing at me already, lol. Anyway, I'm not just going to say "Well to fix it just buff tier one/2 troops" or "Just make it do less DPS". No. That never fixes anything. So, nerfing I.T and buffing T1/2 troops are out of the question, what can I do? Well, my idea involves some math, so hang in there. But I think that the I.T should start out with just 1 target and work up to 4. It would involve how long it has been attacking. A higher level I.T has lower warm-up time and more targets.
Stats:
Level one: 1 base target, 4 seconds warmup.
Level two: 2 base targets, 3 seconds warmup.
Level three: 2 base targets, 2.5 seconds warmup.
This may be difficult to program in though, sorry if that's the case SC. Do you think this would help? Should base targets be 2 instead of one so not to U.P I.T? Should this be single spaced?

EDIT: 222nd post lol!

Comment, Bump, Live Life.
March 21st, 2014
dahimi

What's with the odd line spacing and lack of paragraphs? I assume you want people to read your post, why make it a chore?
March 21st, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by dahimi

What's with the odd line spacing and lack of paragraphs? I assume you want people to read your post, why make it a chore?

Its called double space ill change it. I forgot to indent also lol.
March 22nd, 2014
Siddmaster

Anybody got anything to say about this? Is it a good idea? So far not much response...
March 23rd, 2014
Siddmaster

I bet no one even reads this....
March 23rd, 2014
heerzer

well they do!
nice idea, i like it because pushing is a burden with multiple infernos.
March 23rd, 2014
Benson822175

Most creative fix i have seen. Maybe reduce the time it takes to increase targets, or start at 3 rather than 1. and maybe have level ones get a max of 3 targets and level three get a max of 5 targets.
March 24th, 2014
Kjeldinator

Inferno towers are already 'nerfed' there are hogs now which counter them just fine :) and, if they were so op as some say, why are still so many defences lost? I really son't undertsand the fuss about it, its an endgame item, it ahould be OP really shouldnt it?
March 24th, 2014
daz258

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldinator

Inferno towers are already 'nerfed' there are hogs now which counter them just fine :) and, if they were so op as some say, why are still so many defences lost? I really son't undertsand the fuss about it, its an endgame item, it ahould be OP really shouldnt it?

I think most dislike the fact that even at lv 1 it is so effective.

Lv 3 is end game so don't change that, but lv 1 should be changed.

I think lv 1 should only have 3 targets, lv 2 have 4 targets; and lv 3 have 5 targets.

At the moment I am finding some of lamest ever bases, but have lv 1 inferno towers and are damn hard to beat...
March 24th, 2014
Kjeldinator

Quote:

Originally Posted by daz258

I think most dislike the fact that even at lv 1 it is so effective.

Lv 3 is end game so don't change that, but lv 1 should be changed.

I think lv 1 should only have 3 targets, lv 2 have 4 targets; and lv 3 have 5 targets.

At the moment I am finding some of lamest ever bases, but have lv 1 inferno towers and are damn hard to beat...

Those lame bases mean they gemmed, and sonce people gem for IT, thye wont change it sinc eless people gem
March 24th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benson822175

Most creative fix i have seen. Maybe reduce the time it takes to increase targets, or start at 3 rather than 1. and maybe have level ones get a max of 3 targets and level three get a max of 5 targets.

Thanks for the idea! I'll edit the idea right now! Keep the support up so Supercell sees this!
March 24th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldinator

Inferno towers are already 'nerfed' there are hogs now which counter them just fine :) and, if they were so op as some say, why are still so many defences lost? I really son't undertsand the fuss about it, its an endgame item, it ahould be OP really shouldnt it?

Well it shouldn't be as OP as it is... it should be OP but not too OP if you know what I mean...
March 25th, 2014
makerz

Overpowerd

Inferno towers are over powered ... lvl g giants get eaten up evin with heal spell
March 25th, 2014
Chadamus

I stopped reading at the assumption that there is something wrong with infernos.
March 25th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chadamus

I stopped reading at the assumption that there is something wrong with infernos.

Only multi mode- single mode is still great for taking out T1 troops. :/
March 25th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by makerz

Inferno towers are over powered ... lvl g giants get eaten up evin with heal spell

U know it neglects healing effects...
March 26th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kjeldinator

Those lame bases mean they gemmed, and sonce people gem for IT, thye wont change it sinc eless people gem

It also ruins the game for those gemmers, since most of them quit and they won't pay SC any more monnie.
March 26th, 2014
TJPride

I am TH10 with two rank 2 infernos, and yes, they are OP on multi-target. Shouldn't hit so many targets at lower ranks, shouldn't negate healers. They were designed as a fix for hogs, but short of golem pekka wiz/witch, hogs are really the best way to kill them. What really got shafted was giant healer, balloons. Rank 1 shouldn't be auto win fir vast majority of attacks, even with crappy defense levels.
March 26th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJPride

I am TH10 with two rank 2 infernos, and yes, they are OP on multi-target. Shouldn't hit so many targets at lower ranks, shouldn't negate healers. They were designed as a fix for hogs, but short of golem pekka wiz/witch, hogs are really the best way to kill them. What really got shafted was giant healer, balloons. Rank 1 shouldn't be auto win fir vast majority of attacks, even with crappy defense levels.

Ikr, IT's are way too powerful, but I didn't want to post an idea to just put less targets or do less DPS on targets, then hogs would become base killers again in Champs. That's why I posted this idea, the balance it out but not in the most direct way.
March 26th, 2014
adrock

ITs are bad for raiders and good for bases. If your base was getting 100%ed every time then you'd want a way to defend it better, but since you're the raider you want a way to get through the ITs. A perfect balance is hard to find, but SC has done a great job finding that balance overall. I'm sorta neutral about them.
March 27th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by adrock

ITs are bad for raiders and good for bases. If your base was getting 100%ed every time then you'd want a way to defend it better, but since you're the raider you want a way to get through the ITs. A perfect balance is hard to find, but SC has done a great job finding that balance overall. I'm sorta neutral about them.

I'm only neutral about single mode, disco ball mode is just TOO POWERFUL.
March 28th, 2014
TJPride

Quote:

Originally Posted by Siddmaster

Ikr, IT's are way too powerful, but I didn't want to post an idea to just put less targets or do less DPS on targets, then hogs would become base killers again in Champs. That's why I posted this idea, the balance it out but not in the most direct way.

Sure, if you haven't set up your base to defend vs hogs. TH10's generally don't even bother with hog defense, because a couple infernos win most of the time regardless. So they build solely for golem pekka wiz/witch, and rely on their defense levels to take out hogs. Bad idea, imho, makes TH10 more or less invulnerable to everything. There should always be trade-offs. And again, I'm TH10 and working on my final upgrades, so I'm advocating nerfing my own defenses. It's just necessary for game balance.
March 29th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJPride

Sure, if you haven't set up your base to defend vs hogs. TH10's generally don't even bother with hog defense, because a couple infernos win most of the time regardless. So they build solely for golem pekka wiz/witch, and rely on their defense levels to take out hogs. Bad idea, imho, makes TH10 more or less invulnerable to everything. There should always be trade-offs. And again, I'm TH10 and working on my final upgrades, so I'm advocating nerfing my own defenses. It's just necessary for game balance.

Well, yeah, IT's just kill hogs, so you don't really need hog defense if that's what you're saying.
March 30th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Siddmaster

Well, yeah, IT's just kill hogs, so you don't really need hog defense if that's what you're saying.

Just don't quote me on that.:rolleyes:
March 30th, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Siddmaster

Just don't quote me on that.:rolleyes:

Seriously, don't :rolleyes:
March 30th, 2014
fenn93

level 2 and three i wouldnt even think about touching. i would say im a fairly good clasher at th9 with it nearly maxed and they just tear apart any army without GoWi(Wi or Pe) or a freeze spell
March 31st, 2014
Siddmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenn93

level 2 and three i wouldnt even think about touching. i would say im a fairly good clasher at th9 with it nearly maxed and they just tear apart any army without GoWi(Wi or Pe) or a freeze spell

Well, thanks for agreeing with me.

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 AM.