I think it should take elixer. The reason is everything you need to battle takes elixer. Als
Printable View
I think it should take elixer. The reason is everything you need to battle takes elixer. Als
No the whole point (i think) is that you need to spend gold and elixer to raid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Merican
The point I'm trying to make is that everything you need to raid takes elixer. Such as troops,spells why not make the next button take elixer. Since searching is what you need to do so you can raid. Atleast this way when gold is hard to find or not going negative. This way less people will complain about loot. Another good idea is to this for only th10. Because there isn't lots of elixer upgrades compared to gold.
Or they could just reduce the cost.
That would be nice too but using elixer and not going negative sounds really good
i think if they did this the farmers would be happy but the pushers would not be happy i say just lower the cost by a big ammount
Townhall 10's still have 6-10 options to farm decent to good loot. I've tried all but two of them, they work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Merican
It would be impossible to upgrade anything with elixir, with troops, spells, and the next button all taking it away with each raid. It would be more efficient to keep it at gold but give the money spent nexting to the people being nexted, therefore keeping the money in the system.
PS Should this go in the Ideas & Feature Requests Forum?
Yeah, I wouldn't mind pressing next 200 times as much if it took elixer or even if it took less gold
I agree with the OP, I always have more elixir than gold, i think they should balance it more, which they have already started by making spells cost elixir, imo this is a pretty decent and smart suggestion.