It's behind the pekka statue behind the th, it gets cut off in most pics. You should have 1 left over.
Printable View
Ok testing. Let's see if I can improve it. I have no experience of its previous version, so what is the current problem? It seems to me that 2 core WT are a bit underutilized? Can barch or multi waves attacks break the tunnel?
Nice, many people on this forum seem to dislike vaults so a version that spreads out the loot would be great.
I'm going to edit this in a sec with the picture of the transformable version of this base I've been using.
Farming version.
http://i59.tinypic.com/w972fk.jpg
Townhall centralized.
http://i61.tinypic.com/35be3as.jpg
Clan castle centralized.
http://i60.tinypic.com/2aes3zp.jpg
Nothing so far, few people try to break the base with brute force, no big hit but the core is totally breakable but mostly they die at the wall. I don't like a big vault so, I swap 1 gold storage , exilir storage and de drill location to spread them out. Seem more effective to me.
Anyway got 100% by balloonies but it's cool People dont do it regularly at this level.
Made the variation from this layout for more protection from BARCH attack
here the variation
V.1 (still vulnerability with BARCH attack)
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/Ex...g=w940-h529-no
V.2 (My current base, much better from BARCH attack protection)
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/kS...A=w940-h529-no
I like to spread the loot, and it's can be a transformer base too.
Nice! The only problem I can see is that the giants will path into the core with both bases. I think it would be be more reliable in the first one to move the arms 1 block clockwise, but the clockwise pathing will still not work work. In the v2 you could again move them 1 block clockwise but then switch the bk/elixir/mine with the mortars and wizard towers. Again the clockwise pathing would still be funky, but off the top of my head I can't think of anything. It seems like a really great start to a version that isn't a core, I hope you keep working on it.
Edit: Actually clockwise pathing would work with the second, but it wouldn't with the change I sugeseted (but then it would work counterclockwise) so there is probably a better option that would make it work both ways.