New idea: Have a militia

Right now the only troops that can defend your village are the clan castle troops and that's good but you dependent on your clan mates and what they give you also you may use your clan castle to attack not defend so then you would have no troops to help defend.

My Solution: A Every Village have a local Militia

Here's what a militia would let you do they would let you store certain types of troops in the militia, similar to a clan castle it starts out with a troop capacity to 10 but go's to 50. Their you could store some troops that you train to defend but once you store them you can't remove them. ( I know some players would use that to store some extra troops and when they done attacking take them out and didn't have to train them). Depending on the level of the Militia would determine what troops you could store.

Local Militia Available to you in at a level 4 town hall.

Level 1 militia capacity 10 troops ( barbs,archers,goblins and giants .)
Level 2 militia capacity 15 troops ( now allowed to add wall breakers, balloons and wizards.)
Level 3 militia capacity 25 troops ( now allowed to add healers, minions and hog riders).
Level 4 militia capacity 40 troops (now allowed to add dragons and Valkyries).
Level 5 militia capacity 50 troops ( now all troops are allowed.)

Why have this ?

Why have this is because this would give the players more control and be less dependent on defense from clan mates. Also it would let the players to use their clan castle more on attack. And would now cause players to think more about their strategy in defense and what troops should they use.

Always want to hear what you guys think, any suggestions or ideas to make this better!

This would be way too OP

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

Right now the only troops that can defend your village are the clan castle troops and that's good but you dependent on your clan mates and what they give you also you may use your clan castle to attack not defend so then you would have no troops to help defend.

My Solution: A Every Village have a local Militia

Here's what a militia would let you do they would let you store certain types of troops in the militia, similar to a clan castle it starts out with a troop capacity to 10 but go's to 50. Their you could store some troops that you train to defend but once you store them you can't remove them. ( I know some players would use that to store some extra troops and when they done attacking take them out and didn't have to train them). Depending on the level of the Militia would determine what troops you could store.

Local Militia Available to you in at a level 4 town hall.

Level 1 militia capacity 10 troops ( barbs,archers,goblins and giants .)
Level 2 militia capacity 15 troops ( now allowed to add wall breakers, balloons and wizards.)
Level 3 militia capacity 25 troops ( now allowed to add healers, minions and hog riders).
Level 4 militia capacity 40 troops (now allowed to add dragons and Valkyries).
Level 5 militia capacity 50 troops ( now all troops are allowed.)

Why have this ?

Why have this is because this would give the players more control and be less dependent on defense from clan mates. Also it would let the players to use their clan castle more on attack. And would now cause players to think more about their strategy in defense and what troops should they use.

Always want to hear what you guys think, any suggestions or ideas to make this better!

---

You would definitely need to beef up the offensive troops then, but I don't think this should be added. That's what the CC troops r for and if u don't like what yr clan gives you, then find a new one

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ragerrodent

You would definitely need to beef up the offensive troops then, but I don't think this should be added. That's what the CC troops r for and if u don't like what yr clan gives you, then find a new one

---

That's why only certain types of troops can be with certain types of militia. Also you do know that same people use their to attack right?, and you can't keep asking your clan again and again. This would make the player less dependent on the clan but make him dependent it on his/hers self. It's a great idea and I don't think you get the concept....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

That's why only certain types of troops can be with certain types of militia. Also you do know that same people use their to attack right?, and you can't keep asking your clan again and again. This would make the player less dependent on the clan but make him dependent it on his/hers self. It's a great idea and I don't think you get the concept....

---

I don't get the concept? The game is called "Clash of Clans" ...you're supposed to be dependent on your clan! I get the concept just fine thank-you very much!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ragerrodent

I don't get the concept? The game is called "Clash of Clans" ...you're supposed to be dependent on your clan! I get the concept just fine thank-you very much!

---

Yes I understand its called Clash of Clans but answer this why don't the clans fight against each other clan vs clan, Supercell has decided to not do that for right now, so I have to give my ideas based on the game right now and right now the clans aren't that important in attacking. This idea is just a good idea to help players, gives them more options and make them make more decisions on their own. Also you don;t have to get so angry and I am not saying we should get rid of the clan castle but just add a militia.

This is a very good idea that could help improve our defensive techniques. I myself have lost many trophies to people attacking me. I wish for that to change. My clan gives me great troops however I end up using those for offense not defense. If we had a millitia I think it should be exclusivly for defense. This is a great idea all together!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZeusMathenson

This is a very good idea that could help improve our defensive techniques. I myself have lost many trophies to people attacking me. I wish for that to change. My clan gives me great troops however I end up using those for offense not defense. If we had a millitia I think it should be exclusivly for defense. This is a great idea all together!

---

That's exactly why we need this it would help low level players out but, also would let you use your clan castle for attack more then deciding and having to make a call that could cause you to get trophies or lose them. I think you got what I am saying and would help everybody!

I like it if maybe the troops within are weakened. The upgrade cost should be very high as well. Both of these would balance out the op aspect of this.

Oh great. When I attack, I have to worry about 80 troops on defense plus heroes plus traps plus the base's defenses itself. Congratulations, you've completely made attacking next to impossible.

This would be a really good addition to the game superraven. You don't have to ask your clanmates all the time for troops. You can just have troops in your village for defense plus the clan castle.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soccercrazy1

I like it if maybe the troops within are weakened. The upgrade cost should be very high as well. Both of these would balance out the op aspect of this.

---

What we would do is also have an upkeep for the troops inside so you would have you pay in gold every hour to keep them in their. Also I think if we added this we would now use are clan castle mainly for attack to and finally I do agree about the troops should be lowered, we could add an affect that lower's all the units in the militia stats by 5%, that could help overall thanks for the feedback really appreciate!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KamikazePekka

Oh great. When I attack, I have to worry about 80 troops on defense plus heroes plus traps plus the base's defenses itself. Congratulations, you've completely made attacking next to impossible.

---

Calm down dude. You don't like it. We get it , but don't be so harsh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soccercrazy1

Calm down dude. You don't like it. We get it , but don't be so harsh.

---

He's actually telling what the flaws would be, and I agree with him. It's already hard enough to take out 2 heroes and 30 cc troops... I often use 50+ troops for that if the defending troops are high lvl...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soccercrazy1

Calm down dude. You don't like it. We get it , but don't be so harsh.

---

Thank You soccercrazy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Metten98

He's actually telling what the flaws would be, and I agree with him. It's already hard enough to take out 2 heroes and 30 cc troops... I often use 50+ troops for that if the defending troops are high lvl...

---

First of all that can easily be fixed, We would make the troops in the militia have a lower stats maybe by 10% or so, also now players would mainly use their clan castle to attack since they now that something can help protect them. Also you would be able to see the troops people have in their militias before you attack and finally this is designed to help low level players and farmers and give them better protection. Also it shouldn't be easy to win an attack its not easy when it happens in wars in real life it shouldn't be here to, it should require some difficultly and planning.

I'd suggest being able to add to your own CC. This way you don't have to ask for donations. You can put any troops just like donating but you donate to yourself. Your donate and receive stay the same of course.
Not independent defensive troops, you just add to your CC.
The problem is that donating would go down as you level up. You're more likely to put your own troops in than accept donations from lower players but I'd be okay with that. I'd gladly give to my lower clanmates and it would put the "didn't donate enough" arguments to bed once and for all.
It would avoid those disastrous moments when you come online and see your CC is empty and nobody in your clan is online to donate to help "fix" your defense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

First of all that can easily be fixed, We would make the troops in the militia have a lower stats maybe by 10% or so, also now players would mainly use their clan castle to attack since they now that something can help protect them. Also you would be able to see the troops people have in their militias before you attack and finally this is designed to help low level players and farmers and give them better protection. Also it shouldn't be easy to win an attack its not easy when it happens in wars in real life it shouldn't be here to, it should require some difficultly and planning.

---

I'll quote dahimi's posting guide to begin with because of the exceptions you keep adding:

"7. If you find that your idea requires a lot of exceptions in order to be feasible, it's likely not a good idea.

Nearly all clan wars ideas suffer from this. Someone posts a clan wars idea and they have to keep amending it in response to people posting all of the ways it won't work."

Second, I use my CCC for attacking all the time, but still get troops for upcoming attacks and more importantly, defenses. And the point which has been brought up already about it being difficult to attack as it is, with 2 heroes and 30 capacity worth of troops, this change would make attacking a complete nightmare. You only need to look at the won attacks / won defences numbers for the top100-or-something players to see how vastly attacks already trumph defence.

Low level players and farmers already have the loot penalty protecting them from higher players, and the defenses on lower THs (if not majorly underleveled) match the offense pretty neatly.

This addition is not needed, and though it might look attractive for the lower level players, it would completely wreck mid and especially high level gameplay. Just because you're sitting on one end of the couch at one moment doesn't mean you should poop in the seat next to you, because you'll be sitting there yourself before you even know it. That's a poor translation of a saying I've once heard, but it makes my point quite well in this case.

Making parallels to real life wars doesn't add credit to your argument, either.

This would be insanely overpowered.

I would max mine immediately and fill it with wizards at all times.
Anyone fancy raiding a base with 18 Level 5 wizards pouring out on defense?
With those sort of numbers I'd even give valkyries another go.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rastis

I'll quote dahimi's posting guide to begin with because of the exceptions you keep adding:

"7. If you find that your idea requires a lot of exceptions in order to be feasible, it's likely not a good idea.

Nearly all clan wars ideas suffer from this. Someone posts a clan wars idea and they have to keep amending it in response to people posting all of the ways it won't work."

Second, I use my CCC for attacking all the time, but still get troops for upcoming attacks and more importantly, defenses. And the point which has been brought up already about it being difficult to attack as it is, with 2 heroes and 30 capacity worth of troops, this change would make attacking a complete nightmare. You only need to look at the won attacks / won defences numbers for the top100-or-something players to see how vastly attacks already trumph defence.

Low level players and farmers already have the loot penalty protecting them from higher players, and the defenses on lower THs (if not majorly underleveled) match the offense pretty neatly.

This addition is not needed, and though it might look attractive for the lower level players, it would completely wreck mid and especially high level gameplay. Just because you're sitting on one end of the couch at one moment doesn't mean you should poop in the seat next to you, because you'll be sitting there yourself before you even know it. That's a poor translation of a saying I've once heard, but it makes my point quite well in this case.

Making parallels to real life wars doesn't add credit to your argument, either.

---

I'm not going to lie that was a very good case you made but I don't think you get the point why should't you have defenders to protect your base, it;s common sense we have soldiers that attack and soldiers that defend. Then the quote, not a fan of that quote and I never was whats its saying is if the idea isn't perfect its trash and that's not true, ideas start off with errors and bugs but they can be fixed. Really now idea has been perfect from the start and though you make good points, In my opinion it is still to easy to attack in this game, I am not saying it's easy but it should be harder. Also it would help out the player individuality really now judging a player on their attack skills but also their skills. And to add on the troops in the militia would have an upkeep 100 gold per troop every 2 hours and 200 for a level 2 troops so on, which would stop limit same people of putting really high troops in their.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

Yes I understand its called Clash of Clans but answer this why don't the clans fight against each other clan vs clan, Supercell has decided to not do that for right now, so I have to give my ideas based on the game right now and right now the clans aren't that important in attacking. This idea is just a good idea to help players, gives them more options and make them make more decisions on their own. Also you don;t have to get so angry and I am not saying we should get rid of the clan castle but just add a militia.

---

Supercell has already said they will add clan wars this year...and I'm sorry for getting angry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ragerrodent

Supercell has already said they will add clan wars this year...and I'm sorry for getting angry

---

Hey it's ok we all get emotional in debates and I didn't know about that Supercell would add clan wars this year, so thanks for that inforamtion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

I'm not going to lie that was a very good case you made but I don't think you get the point why should't you have defenders to protect your base, it;s common sense we have soldiers that attack and soldiers that defend. Then the quote, not a fan of that quote and I never was whats its saying is if the idea isn't perfect its trash and that's not true, ideas start off with errors and bugs but they can be fixed. Really now idea has been perfect from the start and though you make good points, In my opinion it is still to easy to attack in this game, I am not saying it's easy but it should be harder. Also it would help out the player individuality really now judging a player on their attack skills but also their skills. And to add on the troops in the militia would have an upkeep 100 gold per troop every 2 hours and 200 for a level 2 troops so on, which would stop limit same people of putting really high troops in their.

---

I don't interpret the quote the same way you do - a new idea definetly doesn't need to be trash. I was trying to say that if someone has an idea, and people point out flaws along the way and the person keeps putting in exceptions and special rules for every comment it likely isn't a good idea. Not saying your idea is like that, but some exceptions have been added already - just food for thought.

When you say it's easy to attack, may I ask what TH level you are?

Because I remember back when I was farming at TH7 and TH8 it was pretty easy to breeze through most bases, with TH9s becoming harder but still doable with giant healer if they weren't maxed. Once you start running into bases with hard-to-lure CCs and 2 heroes it starts getting really difficult, however. And that's just a total of 30 troop capacity in the CC.

About the upkeep, that's an original idea, I have to admit. 100 g per troop per hour (level 1) adds up to 1k/hour, the 200/troop at level 2 ups it to 3k/hour, and I can't even start to guess what we'd end up with by the end. Now I assume that high level players who trophy push would pay the upkeep around the clock, since they are already going all-out in order to rank high on the leaderboards, but I think they would still not be happy with this. Why is that, because this cements their defences quite nicely? Well, most of them (if not all) are already spending 1000s of €/$ every season to gem troops, heroes and shields, this would add up fairly fast as well I think, forcing them to spend more money on this. Because if one person spends it, pretty much all who don't do it are at a disadvantage - that's the attitude up there in Champ, from what I've gathered - I don't claim to have any personal experience of it.

Looking at level 1 upkeep costs, 1k/hour - do you think this is something new players would like to use, or would it be too steep a price to pay? After all, you wrote that this is there to help new players and lowbie farmers, would they fancy to haemorrhage a potential 24k / 72k per hour at low levels? I'm not sure, it's a toughie. Some might, some might not.

I do however know that I wouldn't want to attack bases where hordes of wizards rush out from two buildings (CC and militia building), because trust me, it's not easy when higher up in cups and faced against mostly TH10s (I'm currently TH9, finishing my TH upgrade in 3 days) - seldom do I 3-star another TH9 base, unless they have crucial defences upgrading or are just semi-progressed in regard to their defences. Another 40-50 troops to combat would be absolutely gamebreaking, which is the main point why I still believe this is not a good idea.



I get the feeling this idea stems from being in a bad clan with slow donations, or at least in part due to reasons linked to that - I might be wrong. However, I'd like to give some very general advice regarding clans (please forgive me for going slightly offtopic here, Superraven). In retrospect I also apologize for the terrible wall of text, haha :rolleyes: but wanted to give an elaborate answer since you obviously have put down some time and though on your idea.

I encourage lower TH players and low level players to do their best to find an active clan, and to work on their base and troop levels so that they have something to offer to stronger clans. Once you've found one with good, kind people who donate a lot, make sure you donate lots as well (the requested troops, not just giants or whatever) - this way you will ensure you have a great stay and future in the clan. Don't ask for leader or promotions, this is generally frowned upon and if anything will make you less likely to be promoted if in a decent clan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rastis

I don't interpret the quote the same way you do - a new idea definetly doesn't need to be trash. I was trying to say that if someone has an idea, and people point out flaws along the way and the person keeps putting in exceptions and special rules for every comment it likely isn't a good idea. Not saying your idea is like that, but some exceptions have been added already - just food for thought.

When you say it's easy to attack, may I ask what TH level you are?

Because I remember back when I was farming at TH7 and TH8 it was pretty easy to breeze through most bases, with TH9s becoming harder but still doable with giant healer if they weren't maxed. Once you start running into bases with hard-to-lure CCs and 2 heroes it starts getting really difficult, however. And that's just a total of 30 troop capacity in the CC.

About the upkeep, that's an original idea, I have to admit. 100 g per troop per hour (level 1) adds up to 1k/hour, the 200/troop at level 2 ups it to 3k/hour, and I can't even start to guess what we'd end up with by the end. Now I assume that high level players who trophy push would pay the upkeep around the clock, since they are already going all-out in order to rank high on the leaderboards, but I think they would still not be happy with this. Why is that, because this cements their defences quite nicely? Well, most of them (if not all) are already spending 1000s of €/$ every season to gem troops, heroes and shields, this would add up fairly fast as well I think, forcing them to spend more money on this. Because if one person spends it, pretty much all who don't do it are at a disadvantage - that's the attitude up there in Champ, from what I've gathered - I don't claim to have any personal experience of it.

Looking at level 1 upkeep costs, 1k/hour - do you think this is something new players would like to use, or would it be too steep a price to pay? After all, you wrote that this is there to help new players and lowbie farmers, would they fancy to haemorrhage a potential 24k / 72k per hour at low levels? I'm not sure, it's a toughie. Some might, some might not.

I do however know that I wouldn't want to attack bases where hordes of wizards rush out from two buildings (CC and militia building), because trust me, it's not easy when higher up in cups and faced against mostly TH10s (I'm currently TH9, finishing my TH upgrade in 3 days) - seldom do I 3-star another TH9 base, unless they have crucial defences upgrading or are just semi-progressed in regard to their defences. Another 40-50 troops to combat would be absolutely gamebreaking, which is the main point why I still believe this is not a good idea.



I get the feeling this idea stems from being in a bad clan with slow donations, or at least in part due to reasons linked to that - I might be wrong. However, I'd like to give some very general advice regarding clans (please forgive me for going slightly offtopic here, Superraven). In retrospect I also apologize for the terrible wall of text, haha :rolleyes: but wanted to give an elaborate answer since you obviously have put down some time and though on your idea.

I encourage lower TH players and low level players to do their best to find an active clan, and to work on their base and troop levels so that they have something to offer to stronger clans. Once you've found one with good, kind people who donate a lot, make sure you donate lots as well (the requested troops, not just giants or whatever) - this way you will ensure you have a great stay and future in the clan. Don't ask for leader or promotions, this is generally frowned upon and if anything will make you less likely to be promoted if in a decent clan.

---

First off again another good argument, I am really enjoying this debate. About my clan just to let you know we are a very active clan who donates a lot and is really helpful. A lot of people in my clan used to be in bad ones either inactive or didn't donate, I am co leader in my clan (Imminent Fate) and we have a really good community. About the upkeep I understand your point about being to high maybe we could lower it down to 50 level 1 and 100 level 2 etc. but I would most likely no change the amount but the time maybe 3 hours not 1 would be better. And just to let you know I am Silver 2 and have a town hall of level 6.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

First off again another good argument, I am really enjoying this debate. About my clan just to let you know we are a very active clan who donates a lot and is really helpful. A lot of people in my clan used to be in bad ones either inactive or didn't donate, I am co leader in my clan (Imminent Fate) and we have a really good community. About the upkeep I understand your point about being to high maybe we could lower it down to 50 level 1 and 100 level 2 etc. but I would most likely no change the amount but the time maybe 3 hours not 1 would be better. And just to let you know I am Silver 2 and have a town hall of level 6.

---

I too enjoy a good debate ;) I think we've come almost as close to mutual understanding as we can, I see the attractive qualities of your idea on lower levels, and I've tried to put forward my most pressing concerns about the idea - I will give it a last shot and try to put you in a higher TH player's shoes. Once again I must apologize for the wall of text that's about to hit you.

I checked you out IG, and it's good that you've found a fun and nice clan - the social aspect adds a lot of value to the game. I do, however, think that you will view attacking and defending quite differently in another TH level or two. I remember back to the TH5-6 days, attacking was rather convenient, and often did not require armies with long build times to get nice profits.

What you will start seeing around TH7 and 8 is more elaborate base layouts (at least from players who have watched some famous clashers on youtube, or visited this forum :)) with more segments and centralized CC. The centralized CC does a great deal - with more spread out and larger bases, a central CC is often very hard to lure. I'm not sure if you're familiar with this or not, but a badly placed CC can be triggered/emptied by dropping a barb, archer or minion on the side closest to the CC, and then the troops can be lure to a far-off corner by having an archer attack a building away from the main base. When lured away, the CC troops can be swamped, killed, and the attacker then proceeds to the "real" part of attacking. Now, at TH7-8 people will not only have more centralized CCs, but often a BK patrolling the core of the base. Heroes are easier to lure than most CCs due to their large agro zones and the fact that they are patrolling, but it still adds more pressure to attacking. At THs 9-10 people have an AQ as well as a BK, which makes the situation even more 'interesting'. So, at higher TH levels, a player needs to:

A) Lure out both heroes from the base, lure/kite them to a corner (hopefully there is one far enough away from the defences) and proceed to kill them. This usually takes a good 20-30 troops or so, depending on hero levels - or a full CC + some misc troops with which to lure

B) Lure out the CC and deal with the troops in there, and

C) Proceed to attacking the base, and hope you conserved enough troops and spells to defeat it and get some profit

Now, I hope you see why D) [Lure out militia squad, consisting of another 50 troops, and kill them either during C) or after C), depending on how close and lurable they are] would make attacking, and collecting resources to progress, a horrendous chore.

As loot is now, TH8s can attack TH7s (-10 % loot penalty) with relative ease and without necessitating the use of heavy armies, they can raid other 8s and even some semi-bad 9s. TH9s can raid 8's with relative ease (although it's usually just the maxed 8s who have decent resources), other 9s with decent to heavy armies, and 10s with full-out armies, hoping for a 1-star in most cases, at least if they have Infernos. TH10s, on the other hand, can only attack TH9s (-10 % loot, if they attack 8s they have a 50 % loot penalty) and other TH10s.
So many TH9s, and especially TH10s, have to use time-consuming armies (often 30 min+) and spells (30-45 min/spell) just to have a decent shot at attacking bases and getting some profit. On top of what we're attacking already, I don't think many people would fancy dealing with another 50 troops when attacking, just to try and hold on to some margin of profit. This would require the use of heavy artillery armies with high DE costs, build times and spell cooking times.

At lower TH levels the ratio between loot income from raiding and the cost and time to upgrade things is quite favorable. However, at higher TH levels, 3.2 million gold is pretty much the cheapest defensive upgrade you can do (cheapest max upg at TH9) and up to 8 million gold for some defensive upgrades on TH10. The innate rate of gold generation from collectors is negligible when looking at these numbers, and loot penalty combined with the difficulty of attacking TH9-10 bases is already causing many TH9s and arguably even more TH10s to quit, or consider quitting.

In conclusion, this is pretty much what higher THs deal with right now, and these are the reasons why I think this addition would ruin gameplay at higher THs. It simply would be too painful to try and attack other bases in order to get some form of profit, since it would require the use of 40-60+ minute armies, 3-5 spells per attack (90-150 minutes at a minimum) as well as use of both CC and heroes, just to have a shot at gaining a potential 400k gold and elixir, coupled with some DE. With these concluding points I rest my case, and if you after reading this still think your addition is a good idea, I rest my case and agree to disagree.

Over and out,
Rastis

edit: Fun fact of the day: my browser crashed while writing my concluding remarks, so I actually wrote this crapload of text TWICE. Sad, is it not?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

First of all that can easily be fixed, We would make the troops in the militia have a lower stats maybe by 10% or so, also now players would mainly use their clan castle to attack since they now that something can help protect them. Also you would be able to see the troops people have in their militias before you attack and finally this is designed to help low level players and farmers and give them better protection. Also it shouldn't be easy to win an attack its not easy when it happens in wars in real life it shouldn't be here to, it should require some difficultly and planning.

---

1. 10% is almost nothing. The additional 50 populations troops are so OP that 10% won't change it.

2. People will still use CC when they log out to sleep/work/school/etc. It won't change the CC is one of the best defensive building

3. Basing the game balance at low level is really hard. It will be too OP at high level. While right now heroes are buffed and offence has too many power, this defence will make it impossible to win

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

I'm not going to lie that was a very good case you made but I don't think you get the point why should't you have defenders to protect your base, it;s common sense we have soldiers that attack and soldiers that defend. Then the quote, not a fan of that quote and I never was whats its saying is if the idea isn't perfect its trash and that's not true, ideas start off with errors and bugs but they can be fixed. Really now idea has been perfect from the start and though you make good points, In my opinion it is still to easy to attack in this game, I am not saying it's easy but it should be harder. Also it would help out the player individuality really now judging a player on their attack skills but also their skills. And to add on the troops in the militia would have an upkeep 100 gold per troop every 2 hours and 200 for a level 2 troops so on, which would stop limit same people of putting really high troops in their.

---

Actually, your arguments aren't good enough. Soldiers in this game has a very unbalance DPS compared to most defensive building. That's why CC, with 20 capacity can already decide the win or lose of a defence. 50 additional population is so OP that it won't work
100 gold per troop level per 2 hour is barely anything. it wouldn't limit people at all
.
.
.
if the limit of max level building is 10 or so, it's not that bad

This sounds like it would make the clan castle worthless.

Stick four witches in there im set for life bro :cool:

This is way too OP. We already have the clan castle, heroes, and traps to worry about, they're enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nmills

This sounds like it would make the clan castle worthless.

---

It wouldn't at all because now you could use to attack more then defend now. Also you would have control more of your defense since you could actually pick the soldiers you want to defend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DoritosNinja

This is way too OP. We already have the clan castle, heroes, and traps to worry about, they're enough.

---

You could easily fix that by lowering the damage defenses currently do. You may ask what's the point then? Well you have more control of you defense since you can put the troops you want to defend out their and also use your clan castle mainly for attack now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

You could easily fix that by lowering the damage defenses currently do. You may ask what's the point then? Well you have more control of you defense since you can put the troops you want to defend out their and also use your clan castle mainly for attack now.

---

Then that would destroy the whole "Defense" factor.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ImJimbo

Stick four witches in there im set for life bro :cool:

---

First of all you would have to pay an upkeep for them every 2 hours or so. Second once someone attacks you then they are used up just like any other troop if they live or not. Third that's the point to have a good defense right now, well at least what I am seeing is that most times battles happen the attacker wins not the defenders this would make it more balanced and better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pokeguy1223

Then that would destroy the whole "Defense" factor.

---

It wouldn't lower the defense factor because you would lower it to a point of making it balanced like 10% or so and now you would have the troops in the militia you could use. But the difference is you have more control this way since you have more troops to choose from then defenses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Superraven

It wouldn't lower the defense factor because you would lower it to a point of making it balanced like 10% or so and now you would have the troops in the militia you could use. But the difference is you have more control this way since you have more troops to choose from then defenses.

---

Have you ever seen "Building a good defense is as important as aggressive attacking"
The point of defense is not to stick 12 wizards on it and win. The point is to take time to build a defense. Not put a 24 minute army on it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pokeguy1223

Have you ever seen "Building a good defense is as important as aggressive attacking"
The point of defense is not to stick 12 wizards on it and win. The point is to take time to build a defense. Not put a 24 minute army on it.

---

You don't get it this would give you more options for you defense and it would take a long time to master what troops would go best it would take a lot of finding the best troop combination.

Lol... TH4... How cute.

50 extra troops? Oh my... Sorry, that's just too much...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheConfuzed1

Lol... TH4... How cute.

50 extra troops? Oh my... Sorry, that's just too much...

---

It starts off with level 1 militia, in town hall 4 that has a capacity of 10 troops. As you upgrade your town hall then it increases, and you would be able to unlock 50 troops at the town hall level 10 or so, maybe you should read next time and realize that the system would work.

Did you see my post from earlier today? If not, you're in for a long read :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rastis

Did you see my post from earlier today? If not, you're in for a long read :rolleyes:

---

I saw the post I was just working on my next thread, Thinking about it and planing about it. I realized that my other posts I never really considered the oppositions side and concerns so for my next idea I am trying to make it better and more moderate it and not as radical as my other's so I didn't have time to reply, And I was sick today so I wasn't really feeling that well. But I am trying to reply quickly and work on my next thread too, thanks for the wait!

We had the same idea! I searched militia and could not find.

I swear, 10 lvl 6 wizards.....Kill anything.