I Realise The Gem Box Was Removed From The Game, My Question Is How Many Gems Did It Give?
Also With The Obstacles Now Giving 6 Gems Etc. I Think It Is Too Easy To Get Gems And It Should Be Changed Back To 1,2 or 3 Gems. Anyone Agree?
Printable View
I Realise The Gem Box Was Removed From The Game, My Question Is How Many Gems Did It Give?
Also With The Obstacles Now Giving 6 Gems Etc. I Think It Is Too Easy To Get Gems And It Should Be Changed Back To 1,2 or 3 Gems. Anyone Agree?
Who complains about more free gems? No one will agree lol
Huh? Your actually complaining about FREE GEMS? Lol are you supercell's spy or something disguised as a regular forum member?
Dude......please tell me you are joking.......
It gave 20 gems, I believe.
i am complaining about the gems i am not some spy and I am no regular forum member, and before you ask i dont buy gemsQuote:
Originally Posted by Geronimosemiro
I also am about to post a thread about how the price of searching should be more than doubled in most cases
Were you dropped on your head as a baby? Its a gift, supercell is being nice, accept it and smile. I guess i could sort of see an argument for doubling next costs which i strongly disagree with, but free gems is free gems. My guess is someone just likes playing devils advocate.
So someone has accomplished what they want in the game and now want it to be harder for others to catch up.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
umm.... ur kidding right
devils advocate? yeah... no its just my opinion which doesn't seem to be acceptableQuote:
Originally Posted by Jsf
close, but not quite. i havent achieved what i want but i dont want it to be so easier for the next generationQuote:
Originally Posted by renewed
nope :)Quote:
Originally Posted by chris12
yes that is correctQuote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
Why exactly do you not think more gems should be distributed?
complaining about free gems? 1st letter of each word capitalized?
Too bad the average per obstacle is only roughly 2 gems still, thanks to the large amount of big fat zeros given out.
back in the day, gems were very valuable, but I feel if they are being given out so often they lose their value. do you not remember the feeling of getting 20 gems from an achievement? it felt so valuable but now wait a day and boom, 20 gems from obstacles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordcthulhu
The obstacles can also give 0 gems now also.
Complaining about too many gems in the game? What next....
I'm looking forward to this one.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
ive been here since May 2013, and ive seen my fair share of complaint threads, but i prefer to think of this almost as an idea than a complaint. I know you've been playing for a while as I've chatted with you on english global and norsk global before. Do you seriously like the idea that the next generation get easy gems where you earnt your gems the hard(er) way?Quote:
Originally Posted by facescraper
as i said its more of a suggestion than a complaint, hopefully you can see where I'm coming from buddy.
same here, who knows I could become the next FreezeSpell, but as long as im not the next BakhoumGeorge or CashClash22 I'm happy :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirky
What... The... Heck...Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
how did you get 1k posts in 1 month. lol i could only get 900 in 5 months...Quote:
Originally Posted by chummer1010
and why am I not allowed an opinion?
What?Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
Humans don't like it when someone else's opinion doesn't coincide with theirs, and will try to change the other person.
Supercell can give everybody 28000 free gems and people would still whine. There's no pleasing these kids.
yeah very true, im surprised no-one has seen my point yet though. I'm expecting someones whos been playing for a while to come through for me!Quote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
its not a complaint, this thread could equally be placed in ideas & suggestionsQuote:
Originally Posted by Somerandomguy64
Sounds like a complaint to me. You're upset there's more gems in the game now than when you started playing. Everyone has more gems though so I don't see the problem. New players can get their builders quicker and we can boost. Everyone is happy.
Dude. I am just praying that this is a troll post. You failed at trolling us, quit trying to extend it farther...
I have no life :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
You can have an opinion; we're just disagreeing with it.
OP, i understand everyone is entitled to an opinion, but yours should be equivilent to that of someone in an insane asylum. Sure, you might be some huge prophet that knows the future and sees things from an all new perspective, but as far as general knowledge, you have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
I see your logic, but quiet frankly I disagree with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
"too easy to get gems and should be changed back"
...
the wut?
so your happy that new players can do what you did, but x1.3 quicker?Quote:
Originally Posted by facescraper
Why the hell not?Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
gems are losing their value... just my opinion and no, this is not a troll, just my honest opinionQuote:
Originally Posted by rjdofu
It's not as if we'll ever run out of a use for gems; we'll be progressing at the same rate as them.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
yeah but if you quit now, they will be able to get to the point you were at quicker because of gems quicker... builders... etc. assuming they did the same thing as youQuote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
I disagree, just because people can gain access to more gems now doesn't mean that it's losing value. The value still stay the same. People boost > get used to boost > crave for more. Easier gems > more Boost > faster raid > more dry resources > encouraging gems.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
The domino effect is actually more complicated than what you think.
If you quit now, then why does it matter how strong the players are? You shouldn't try to hold people back just for the heck of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
i can see your point, and it iis very valid, but i cant quite agree. agree to disagree?Quote:
Originally Posted by rjdofu
ill rephrase:Quote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
if you started at the same time as someone and they got 6 gems for obstacles max and you got 3 max who would get their forth builders first if you did exactly the same thing with gems
(got achievements at the same time, etc.)?
What happened to your main clan?
what main clan?Quote:
Originally Posted by tyson888
Must be kidding or trolling.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
The person receiving 6 would get it first. But you're still getting the same amount of gems as them. Yes, the time it takes them to get their builders will definitely be shorter than yours, but you still have stuff to spend gems on(boosting) that the other person will probably spend on too. No matter how many gems SC gives, you're not going to fall behind, so why would you want to slow everyone down?Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
I really do hope he is.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by badger74
Let me get this straight you don't like free or cheap stuff, well you going to love the real world.
I see where you are coming from but it's from a kind of selfish standpoint. At the end of the day you will also be grabbing more gems and that's the only thing that should really matter to you.
CastingshadowsQuote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
New players won't get any loot bonus when attacking higher TH as it was removed, which means less resources. Maybe you could give these resources back, just to make it fair for everyone. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by badger74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle
have you got a problem with me or something. NOT EVERYTHINGS A BLOODY TROLL, THIS IS LEGIT FFS DEAL WITH MY OPINION. JUST COZ ITS NOT YOURS AND ITS NOT THE GENERAL CONSENSUS! far outttttttttttQuote:
Originally Posted by goinacc
Chil with the caps.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
i guess you are right, but I couldn't really see what was wrong with how it was, no-one really seemed to mention that it should be increased.Quote:
Originally Posted by facescraper
i didnt really see a need to speed up. but with th11 coming out, new players need to get as close to it as possible before it comes out in SC opinion... sorta thingQuote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
That's true, but now that it's happened, I'm not complaining.:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
And besides, if they changed it back now, there would be a ton of people complaining on the forums.
CastingShadows has had a few people that needed a break from the game, a few people who needed to leave for competition, and a few people who wanted to go to Beneath as well as a few people who wanted to make a new clan.Quote:
Originally Posted by tyson888
Overall, the clan is back in Beneath
thats very true, maybe they should just change it without telling anyone and no-one would notice (as if)Quote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
Wow, because 3-6 gems a day must be really game breaking for you, uh? :x
Well, i really hope this is not serious.
Come on man, I get your point but no one else is really complaining about getting more free gems. I mean I don't see many people complaining about gemmers? So what's the problem with getting more free gems, you should agree with it. Your getting the same amount of gems as everyone else so what's the problem with it? Do you think everyone else will get to the same stage as you in a week from a bush that grows back every 2 hours or so? If your worried about that then it's not going to happen, it's not that easy.
I was able to get 20 gems out of my gem box
If you dont want then I'll take your extra gems:pAre you seriously complaining that supercell is giving you to many free gems.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
As we all know, the maximum amount of gems gained from clearing obstacles are now twice the previous one.
But, that doesn't prove your statement that you'd get more gems for clearing them. Supercell might increase the chance of getting low amount of gems that you got from those obstacles, which would result in lower average of gems received.
(I haven't really researched my hypothesis, and I'd be glad if someone helps me)
have em, and my account toQuote:
Originally Posted by Nmills
wait were you wanting to join?Quote:
Originally Posted by tyson888
What's matter? Do you not want other people to catch up with you or something?Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
I bet he's 9.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
you create a thread suggesting that they increase the cost of search by 1000, and another one saying that free gems should be reduced, are you ok?
He sounds like a perfectly normal forumer/ COC gamer to me! He fits the bill :-Quote:
Originally Posted by kah112
'Always complain about whatever SC rolls out'.
Though I must give him an A+ for originality.
There has been no info released on dropped gem reward rates, and seems to be little or no indications of it in the long run when clearing. If someone (less restrained and too emotional) has a bad day and gets 0 gems for clearing 3 obstacles, it sadly is not unlikely that they go on to the forums and write a strongly worded conspiracy thread about how SC is scamming everyone by increasing max amount of gems from obstacles, but cutting down on drop rates. There should be some form of infraction for posting crazy threads with no logic behind them :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by VincentTandya
Some collected sets of obstacle clears were discussed here: http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...tacles!!/page2
with the conclusion that the gem drop amount per obstacle is around 2.1 (based on averages from a few data sets), up from around 1 gem / obstacle pre-patch. This indicates that the drop rate has not decreased, and that we are getting twice as many gems now as we were before the obstacle gem drop change.
Not everything is a conspiracy (eg ⬇️This) and there are documented on other threads the average like said above is up by average 1 gem per obstacle
Gems HAVE to be easier to come by as they add more levels/upgrades to the game, otherwise getting to a competitive level looks far too daunting to new players. It's a similar concept to how WOW made leveling up much faster at the beinning as they expanded the number of levels. What you suggest would actually hurt the game's very survival in the long run, from a marketing standpoint.
I agree, but most things people come up with are without ground or reason, the builder lag is well-documented and proved on multiple occasions in multiple threads. Whether it's intentional ("SC scam") or just difficult to fix is up to question, though - but it is odd that they have not managed to fix it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bfoz
Most threads about game problems and SC scams that I see today, however, are nothing but senseless jibberjabber. People (a disturbingly large part) make too many assumptions and are apt to believe things that suit their thinking.
But the tin foil manufacturers need to get their income from somewhere too, right? :rolleyes:
What have supercell done to you lol
It's a FREE gems and you complaint...
Why would you want to lower it? That's ridiculous.
dont feed the trollz :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
No, I don't agree, and neither do the others who have kept track and found that that frequent zero gem results in 2.0 gems per obstacle, or exactly the same as under the previous system.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
I think you don't understand. It's a ~2 gems/obstacle ON AVERAGE, compared to ~1gem/obstacle ON AVERAGE from before the patch.Quote:
Originally Posted by benr3600
You make it sound as if every obstacle you clear that gives gems gives 2 gems on average, but that this is counteracted by a reduced chance of actually getting gems (i.e. not getting 0 gems). At least that's what your comment sounds like - if that's what you're saying, you seem to be quite wrong, at least according to the number from the thread I linked earlier.
do you know when its coming back? next update i hopeQuote:
Originally Posted by 966souchou
Serious dedication to the thread. And yes it will be back with they next full update.Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBalls
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabyne
Would like to know your toughts about this one OP