The more buildings u have, the harder to protect the 50%

I think the 50% attacks are the #1 vulnerability for maxed out bases..

Obviously the defense towers, army camps, research labs are essential. Even storages make great tanks. But those gold mines and collectors really count against u. Having 5 builder huts with very low hp hurts too.

If I started over again today, I would use
- 0 resource collectors. just raid that gold and elixirs like a real pirate.
- 3 barracks. They would still train faster than the spells and hero regen
- 3 builder huts (will require some gemming)

That's 18 less buildings to protect!! 50% win would be impossible. I would put all my defense in a close ring (like the the spartan phalanx) with TH in the middle. Then another ring of thick walls. Then the storages to tank. My base would be invincible!!

Um.... You really wouldn't. I must ask as much can be lost on the inter-web tone wise... Are you serious or joking?

Each building would also count for a greater percentage. So, less buildings would need to be destroyed to achieve 50%.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rspwnr99

Each building would also count for a greater percentage. So, less buildings would need to be destroyed to achieve 50%.

---

Yeah, but it's harder to destroy a defense than a Builder's Hut.

I would love to see max TH10 with 2-3 builders and no extra collectors. Good luck!

Umm...Having no Collectors, 3 Barracks and 3 Builder Huts is a really big disadvantage in my opinion...

I dont think you understand how percentages work

I always wondered if a gemmer who never got builders huts and gemmed everything would have an advantage or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CunningLinguists

I dont think you understand how percentages work

---

i agree 10 chars

So with your idea, now we need to destroy less buildings to get 50%!