Like I have always mentioned: because I haven't tested it against your base yet, so I am not 100% sure.
Stop being so defensive, PPPPLEASE.
Printable View
Don't make any hasty judgement based on speculations that you are "not 100% sure" about. You want me to not take offend from these?
I didn't make hasty judgements about your base.
I said all that after I mentioned repeatedly that I wasn't sure, until I test it out against your base. And I used the words "I think" in many places, no? I believe you said yourself that your base was a "weak type", not "sturdy type", that is why I followed up with my agreement.
I know it is hard to take criticism, but I didn't mean to offend you. I only wanted to express my opinion based on my experience on attacking and my understanding of base defense strategies. So please, don't take offense, it is hard to make the discussion pleasant when I disagree with you, and I really think the video showed a poor attack on your well designed base. I am only saying that I don't think your base can prevent looting from brute force attacks, or well managed attacks.
Unity,
you should see how much ping cares for his base,
he treats it like a baby:p
No worries, dude. My clan mate is a big fan of yours, and I was a fan of this base design for a long time :cool:, until recently that I learned about the 2 strategies mentioned (again, not sure if they will beat the base design, but I think they have a shot) Peace! :)
Latest 3 defenses with this layout:
Attachment 3982