Please delete, thanks
Printable View
Please delete, thanks
Its so they are considered inactive to the server, and they don't attacked as much i believe.
Up there you might only get 1 trophy per raid. So it's very hard for top players to find a base with more than 1 trophy available.
They more then likely have bought shields with gems. They want to be recognized lol
At champs I was told u can not buy week long shields and this has been going on longer than a week. There was a thread this morning on this subject, it pertained to certain top players using jailbreaks and exploits to stay online for a certain amount of time like the player vizia in the past. I hope I didn't say too much:rolleyes::eek:
You can't talk about this thing on the forum, don't do it
They have found away to play the game and not be attacked. It is pretty obvious how it is done, so i wont mention how it is done. I don't get why the top players bother if they know there are such ways to avoid being attacked.
Wow is this some sort of secret club? Who cares if the top players have ♥♥♥♥♥s? Who cares if they don't get attacked? I say to just leave them to it and worry about getting to the top.
Just a thought, but maybe the top players are taking advantage of a newish phenomenon
It seems to me that big problem in the game are that inactive bases are taken out of the queue very quickly. perhaps the top players have cottoned on to this and by simply not playing for a few days can avoid being attacked, and therefore remain at the top.
Could this be a massive backfire for SC?
I don't know if inactives are really being taken out of the game. I use to, until a friend of mine quit playing about 2 months ago. Now, when I check on his base, it is newly attacked about every day. so at least for him, he's not being hidden by SC. I think we are seeing less inactives out there simply because so many more people are playing from the advertising blitz and the game's popularity. Us actives just drastically outnumber the inactives right now. But hey, if loot stays the same that might change! ;)
You could well be right tony, would be nice to keep this thread alive and maybe get people to post how long it has taken for an inactive base to stop being raided. After all, lots of people look after bases for siblings and friends. Which could well go inactive and we could start a graph or just a list of just how long it takes for a base to stop being raided.
Closing this thread as the topic has been discussed in various other threads.
For more information, you may view here: http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...=1#post1403511