Hold on a second. I thought you were just saying its weird how AQ doesn't have rage. Are you trying to change it? It didn't look like you were in the OP
Printable View
I think the effect for the AQ is fine as is, no need to rage the archers, but it would be cool if they were cloaked too. The cloaking has saved my AQ a number of times already, without it, she would be sleeping a lot more, that is for sure....
Should summoned archers goes insivible as well then!
I think her ability to shake off all the attack and use the summoned archers as decoys is already very good. Not as good as BK ability, but it can be critical in battle.
I think the AQ'S RC is already OP enough n there ain't a need to summon any archs.
Depending on how n when u use the skills, it will show It's true potential in different situations.
I normally use RC when single IT has locked onto AQ n has gone into stage 2 dmg or 2 xbows firing at her.
It saves the waiting time to heal n also gives her extra time to dmg the buildings.
I think it is perfectly fine and balanced how it is now.
For far too long a majority of clashers have rated the Queen superior to the King.
The way these abilities are helps close the gap a bit. That is why the Queen [or her archers] should not benefit from a rage. Or the poor King will just fall behind again.
Also it's not just 'up to 10 archers'. When BK is raged if you have normal barbs deployed nearby they too jump into the rage and benefit.
I think her archers should be invisible for as long as she is