Collectors raids should not have a loot penalty.

So yesterday, while I was pressing "next" countless times, I found a TH7 with full lvl10 mines and collectors giving me just 100k gold and 100k elixir. And I thought, that as a TH8, that raid would've been of 200-250k gold and 200-250k elixir.

I am a TH9, and I am not complaining about loot. I think that loot is... fine... you just have to search more. I do waste like 50k gold searching sometimes, but I don't mind. I am still keeping my loots in black numbers.

My point is, that collectors raids should not be subject to loot penalties. JUST collector raids.

I think, that a TH10 should get the same gold from a TH7 with full maxed collectors as a TH8 does. I think that the storage penalty is fine, but there isn't a point in collector penalties.

This would "boost" loot a little bit, since you are just raiding collectors, not storages. I see plenty of inactive TH7 with full collectors giving me just 100k-, when I see this, I wish I was a TH8 again.

What do you think?

I think this is a good idea, you are not taking advantage of lower THs, because ACTIVE players shouldn't have their collectors full.

Collectors raids should be the same for everyone.

I didnt think there was a loot penalty against collectors

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adamsaking

I didnt think there was a loot penalty against collectors

---

There is one, full maxed collectors don't give just 100k.

Well if you see only 100k/100k then the collectors are not full , I raid th7 daily and they usually give 150k with even not full collectors (I go later and check)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daemon

Well if you see only 100k/100k then the collectors are not full , I raid th7 daily and they usually give 150k with even not full collectors (I go later and check)

---

Still, 150k isn't the loot you would get if you were a th8 or another th7.

I don't think so...

Th9 raiding Th7 is not good idea

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sharonsym

I don't think so...

Th9 raiding Th7 is not good idea

---

Why not? It would just affect the inactive players with full collectors, no storages.

A Th9 raiding a th7 for just his storages wouldn't be profitable.

If you keep your collectors empty, you will be fine. No TH9 will attack you for your full storages and empty collectors, unless you zapped his DE :rolleyes:

This solves nothing, as you only steal from lower townhall players who would get more from that base.

No additional resources = nothing change.

Although I agree that there should be no loot penalty, I did the other day take on a th 7 with only loot in his/her level 11 collectors an received 250k of each, what I think was that the collectors in your raid was not full, but appeared full as when a collector is near full say 60% it will show as a full collector. Btw I am th 9

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sharonsym

I don't think so...

Th9 raiding Th7 is not good idea

---

Loot wise, probably yes due to loot penalty. But as we are talking to collector raids here, its the pinnacle of the inactives, SC should impose a lower penalty (or remove it) as no matter how much we loot it doesnt hurt them.