Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatoneguyIknow
Well I am not complaining. am I? lol
I've read almost all loot topics but I did't even participate even once.
I was just saying that more inactive bases would make people happier. SC could simply fix that.
It's not about "is the loot system ok or not." I am using all my workers. I am doing fine.
But I just don't know why some people don't want the old system back.
Although I am doing fine, more inactive bases would make me and I believe many happier.
Personally i prefer to fight good strong active bases rather than inactive ones. I mostly skip 200-200 or around inactive villages without attacking.
I would prefer if they didn't. The things that gets me is that people want all this "free loot" because that's what abandoned bases are. They are free loot. Sure, we may have to use a few giants and a few dozen gobs, but it's virtually free. I for one play this game (or any game) not just because it's fun, but because I want a mental challenge. This is why all these moaning farmers upset me, because they simply want all this extra loot which they don't have to make any effort for.Quote:
Originally Posted by youngthegreat
So no, leave the abandoned bases out so people actually have to work a bit for their resources. Complaining that you aren't getting enough 300k+ raids? Then stop being so bloody greedy/picky and battle one where the resources may be less. Then, instead of complaining that you've spent 20 minutes hitting next, you could have already battled once, then built another army and started a search for a second battle.
Stop expecting everything for nothing. Actually work a bit for the loot. I'm glad SC is thinning out the abandoned bases.
Quote:
Originally Posted by agr1014
That's exactly what I and many clashers are saying.
It's not "I can't do anything with this loot system"
It's "we were happier and the game was more enjoyable with more inactive bases"
And IMO this is important.
Yep, 'cus everyone must play the way you play.Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
Ok how 'bout this. If the inactive bases are back. People will raid and get stronger faster. Thus, provide you even more challenge. Is that what you want right? Here's the thing, if you don't like inactive bases, DON'T RAID THEM, leave them to us. Enjoy your challenge.
But many of you are saying that I should be forced to play your way? So why is it bad if I say the opposite? Really, what is wrong with some of you?Quote:
Originally Posted by rjdofu
The hell are you talking about, nobody forces you to raid inactive bases, lol. See inactives? Skip em. That's the solution for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
Oh yeah let's ask you a question
Have you raided inactive bases or not?
Have you took it or not?
I bet you took hundred percent of those bases while you almost maxed out your TH9.
And you tell people who didn't get the same chance they are mourning farmers?
ridiculous.
I am using all my workers maxing out my TH9. I have no problem
But I do not deny that I've got all these free bases and it helped me a lot.
you?
Of course it did. and you want that out of the game and call them
mourning farmers. LOL LOL
Of course I have, probably one out of every 15 battles or so if you need a number put on it. What does this have to do with my thoughts on the matter though? The biggest difference is that I'm not complaining about the lack of these bases as I would be fine if there were less. You are obviously choosing not to believe that which is fine. These bases helped me out of course, but I'm more than happy if it takes me a bit longer to advance my base with "real" battles and not just freebies.
more inactive bases won't void you of your 'challenge'Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
Now if you can stop trying so hard to stand out...