Printable View
idk why i chose the word inject, but it seems to fit nicely.. so i do know why.. it fits nicely... anyway get more inactive players into the game how am i supposed to keep 4 builders busy without playing 24/7.
no comments saying stop complaining, i don't want to play 24/7 but still want to play and progress.
Well thats illogical... If you get inactive players into a game then wont they be active? :rolleyes: But I see your point. Alot of them are on shield. for most of the time anyways. They should changed the search que a bit imoQuote:
Originally Posted by Teaas
I most certainly don't play 24/7, a bit more than average but not heaps and I've NEVER had a builder sitting for longer than 12 hours since I started the game nearly a year ago. It is all about forward planning and if you are capable of doing that then there are no worries. Even if you have a bad few days of raiding there are all the traps to upgrade for those 12-24 hours while you can raid a bit more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Teaas
I get in a bout 15-20 battles per day between my "real life" and manage 3 million of each resource pretty easy. If I clash a lot in one day I can manage 5 mil or each or more so resources shouldn't be a problem. I have one clan mate who only gets in about 4-5 battles a day and she has never had her builders sitting either because she thinks about her builds ahead of time... so should you.
Good luck!
With 100 lvl 9 walls, I think you classify as a little more than 'above average'. Loot is terrible these days and even more of a grind than ever, complaining wont do anymore than what has already been said. I am sure they will do something to help it for the next update. If not, well, adios CoC!
not literally 24/7... but you must play a lot.. like 2 hours a day? it's a lot considering i'm fairly busyQuote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
Why must all of you people speak for the entire CoC community when it comes to the loot? I have been doing just fine since the last updates. In all honesty I prefer it cause I typically battle people my own level or higher if possible so more is available. I may have to next a bit more than normally but my raids have been constant over the months.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSpong
Why am I above average because I've have put a lot of gold into my walls? I definitely don't know an "average" hour count for a typical clasher, but I know that 15 raids or so a day is most certainly not overkill like many who never leave their account off until they get booted at the eight hour. I clash, put my army on build and come back later do another and so on. Easy enough.
This is a flawed solution in my opinion. I feel this way because I want to raid my own level of TH or higher. I like the challenge. Sure I like an easy collector raid or two, but feeding off of them is boring.Quote:
Originally Posted by Teaas
But maybe my real problem is dealing with discos.... they've been discouraging me from climbing....
Quote:
Originally Posted by NioTheDreamer
feeding off them would be boring?
other people will also get these collector raids
they will have more loot in there storages
more storage raids as a result.
Win win situation
Well, I at least speak for my whole clan in this sense. That certainly doesn't represent the entire community, but I believe that speaks volumes considering my clan consists of moderately active players who have been around since 2012. Represented throughout the globe - it must just be my clan. When did you start clash?Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
must be just our clans then. not... hes just one player finding good loot, 99% of us don't and if we do, we spend most on searching.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSpong
True..... Still I'd prefer Cystal starting at 32,000/100 bonus or better to reward winningQuote:
Originally Posted by Teaas
Destroying a townhall should not give a shield also we should win bonuses for defenses.
I know many people have been having issues anywhere from TH8-TH10 but I know just as many who have been enjoying the new format more. I guess it depends on how you are playing the game in attack style. My clan is full of mostly very active players from TH4-maxed out TH10 and only one person is complaining about the loot, the rest of us are happy enough. I have been playing for 11 months now.Quote:
Originally Posted by JSpong
For the people who LIVE on this game like many of the top % players, or many on these forums by the looks of it, I can see why you would take issue with so much nexting. I for one, and many of my clan mates just see it differently is all.
Happy clashing.
I think a lot comes from expectations. It just is not possible for every active player to score 250+K gold loots raid in raid out every time they go looking for opponents. Loot varies. Today had a great hour reaching the legendary million gold per hour mark, but that was maybe the third time in my clash career. Both pre and post loot change I have been around 600-750K per hour.Quote:
Originally Posted by Teaas
Thing is I keep seeing bases that are most likely inactives, but they have low level mines and collectors. No point in injection more of these to the game. Basicly SC should rank bases and keep the A class inactives with their maxed mines and collectors. Remove the game drop outs.
The argument is invalid for both of our sidea because either way, the system is broken. Whether your whole clan manages to find 150k raids everytime whereas mine cannot, it should not fluctuate this much. In any game ever created that has resources, one is meant to get more and more, to associate with higher costs and simply being a higher level. Not only do I not get more resources, but I find less loot then when I did as a th 5, 6 etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
The explanation as to why your clan members don't see an issue - you said they range
from th 4 and up; they never saw what loot looked like before. The argument always comes back to being higher level and attacking better opponents. I have been through all of the trophy ranges, crystal and master tend to offer more loot, obviously, but the army and spell output is so unbalanced. Theoretically, the loot system by numbers is much, much better than the previous one. What SC apparently hasn't taken into account, the lack of new resources (been the same for at least half a year), and the growing population taking the best loot, of course being inactives.
I roughly play since July last year to now and am currently nearly done maxing my TH8.
Of course, if you start an upgrade and attack maybe two or three times and then leave until you get the notification that an upgrade was completed, what do you expect? That you log on, go on a raid and immediately get enough gold to upgrade the next building with little to no effort?
Just plan your updates ahead, with TH8 I have upgrade times going up to 12 days costing about 2 to 3 million gold. I try to farm a million gold per day waiting, never upgrade more than two defense towers at the same time (keeping the amount of gold I need at about 4 million every few days) and use my other two builders on cheap trap upgrades or elixir upgrades (of which I have done everyone but elixir collectors now).
It works that way, it's just that it is nothing for casual gaming the further you go in the game.
in the end SC should inject inactives into the gameQuote:
Originally Posted by JSpong
They don't have to "inject" inactives into the game, they just have to stop taking them out. The only thing that keeps gold in the economy is inactive bases. Every active player who has gold is eventually going to use that gold especially since there is basically a place to dump infinite amounts of gold like walls, so where else would people get gold from aside from inactive bases?
they have took way to many out and for them to leave it how it is and not take out more inactives it could take a while. A better solution would be to inject some and keep the in actives in the game at a constant decent amountQuote:
Originally Posted by bandtx
You must have superior "NEXT"ing skills to most. I and everyone of my clan and the majority of my friends and global chats that I have come to the same conclusion. The game's economy is broken. If it is not fixed soon, SC will be extremely busy removing all the inactive bases from the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
haha, this is completely true! they must do something soon, clash of clans was so fun to play, but now it's time for CoC to either die down or do something about the loot, hopefully just fix the loot..Quote:
Originally Posted by S3an
i only do that when i got 4million + gold..Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
cuz if i get raided il lose 350k +
Because the numbers seem to OVERWHELMINGLY be in the loot dry catagory. Sorry sir but you are a minority. So instead of just doubting that we are having an issue and arguing with us about it how about thinking that perhaps there is a problem that you just havent seen yet, may soon see and simply stand back and watch and see what happens.Quote:
Originally Posted by Terraist
Its kinda ridiculous to think that before this loot problem and the new update the same people saying there is no problem before are pretty much the same people as now, and then when they said there wasnt a problem, SC came out and said there was a problem, made an update to address it and have come out saying they are watching this loot issue closely. What do you think they are watching? The problem you arent having yet be we are is what they are watching......
yes this is defiantly true, as the title says in the game they could just inject inactives into the game an viola ! problem solvedQuote:
Originally Posted by Cloudsaves
what do other people think and why aren't supercell listening?