I'm guessing the six wb path referenced is diagonal hitting spike, outer ring, inner ring. While these are possible I find them hard to execute in practice as you have to launch all six wbs essentially simultaneously.
Printable View
I'm guessing the six wb path referenced is diagonal hitting spike, outer ring, inner ring. While these are possible I find them hard to execute in practice as you have to launch all six wbs essentially simultaneously.
Do you mean like the scenario in (A) ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibal
Won't they move in the direction of (B) ?
http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/v...psfafaa547.jpg
Pretty busy at work right now but if there's still confusion I'll draw something later. If you launch along a line like B and launch them all at the same time, they'll follow that same line rather than hitting the spike again the way you'd normally expect.
This works for two walls, but honestly I've never tried to break three walls this way. I think there's a decent chance they'd bug on the second wall and impact adjacent rather than continuing on that line.
Maybe (I forgot the name) but the person advocating the six wb path has made them work more often than I have.
e: You'd obviously want that B line to angle more towards the base so that it hit the inner ring next rather than the next spike
OUH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I KNOW !Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibal
Do you mean like this ?
http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/v...ps527c95ee.jpg
This is also shown in the video that i uploaded earlier this morning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w8CS...eature=mh_lolz
btw, no hurry to reply, your work is more important :)
Just when I think I have a feel for what these WBs do, a video like just shows me how little I understand. This is shocking to me. Ugh I am stupid--I can't believe they walk right past the rest of that spike.Quote:
Originally Posted by Junliang
yea.. but don't you get the andreline rush and feel when you are much much closer in understanding how these stupid wb works ? :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Seamus
i'm getting fired up haha.
Just play around with wb in a raid just now, able to control them much better now ! :o:o:o
They "ignored" the rest of the spike due to their target timer running out (refer to my post in Juliang's WB discussion thread for this timer), and picked a new target closest to their original "directional path." A lot of people have learned to use this as a way to combat these spike/zigzag designs. You essentially "overload" your WBs at a spike, so that the extra WBs target something else, preferably the inner wall.
Damniteveryoneknowshowtobreakspikesnow
;) chillax bro, not everybody frequent the forum, much less forum members who frequent the strategy sub-forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pingfao
btw, its Junliang, not juliang, how many times you want to spell wrong :mad: *slap*
hahaha you turd how dare you enlarge my sekret encrypted texts!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Junliang
And sorry haha I'll spell it properly next time :)
As an example. Pick any spike that gives you a good angle w/ least amount of chance for wb death. FWIW, I normally reserve these kind of strategic details for my own clan. ;)
http://i.imgur.com/4as0joN.jpg