Should spell cooking time be halved?

I wouldn't mind a 25min lightning, heal, jump, and 35 rage/ freeze, but as it stands I can be satisfied. You run into the "We don't want the game to be easy" argument much after that, which is the nice way of saying that it would be too detrimental to profits. (The current state, and plan of an ideal raid revolves around 1-2 spells per raid)

i think they should make the lighning spell 45 min and lower the rest to 20-30 min bcuz u can t get a 2 star or even 1 star in master without all ur spells

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crazyscorp

I think it should be reduced to 1/4. To take on strong bases or any base with inferno towers 4-5 spells and heroes are pretty much mandatory. This now affects farming too much like it has for a long time with pushing.

1 hour is a good time for a strong army trouble is now it takes 1 hour for the troops then 2-3 hours for the spells and 3 hours for the heroes. The game is no fun when you can only raid every 3 hours.

I think they should cut spell time by ¼ and cap hero regen time at 1 hour, this way we can spend more time actually playing and enjoying the game rather than sitting with full camps waiting on heroes and spells. This would mean we could do a decent raid every hour or so which is still a decent time to wait.

Will also give a reason to boost barracks since currently there is no point since a boosted spell factory produces about the same rate as an unboosted barracks.

Those saying they used to be longer. This is true but bases were also a lot weaker and you could get by without spells and heroes, trying to beat any well leveled TH10 or even 9 without spells now is certain to fail

---

Being in Masters league I totally agree I hate only being able to attack every 3 hours or so because I have to wait on heroes and spells. While my normal army set up has finished training: 2 or 3 golem 4 witches 20 wizards n 11 wbs or 30 barbs if i take 2 Golems

+1 make this happen supercell

I think they ought to double the spell cooking times and quadruple spell factory boost rate. That way gemming would allow use of spells more regularly and waiting would be less efficient. This way SC could compensate the losses what they are getting for messing up the loot system. *sarcasm*

How about we all separate what we want to happen and what should be happening?:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SimonY

How about we all separate what we want to happen and what should be happening?:D

---

Well spell reduction SHOULD happen. Bases are not what they used to be, they are much stronger and spells are needed to take them on.

Spells should be stacked . . The more you cook the less time it takes to create sure they can come up with some type of percentile

Long back spells used to take 16hr something excessive like that, its good enough for me.

I fear if it was halved there would be an huge surge in zappers.. So imo its fine how it is.

Of course the majority are going to say yes. But I have not, I am perfectly fine with how it is.

Spells are a real game changer in battles, if they cooked fast and everyone had full sets available nearly all the time. Expect your base to get a few serious beltings - and more DE lightning than ever before too.

So yeah, no change. If you want spells fast, boost your spell factory. Only 20 gems for 4 hours.

Yes defiantly, why would I want to buy spell boost for 20 GEMS! chief pat said its cheaper to just immediately buy them...but that wuz a while ago.