Should spell cooking time be halved?

I have not voted as I don't think the options fit my reason. my answer is no but not because it is fine as it is. the reason is that all you clasher out there that are complaining that there is not enough loot. just imagine how little elixir there would be if they enabled you to create more spells without gemming. I have already seen a massive decrease in my ability to save for troop upgrades etc since they changed the spells from gold to elixir.

so no, it would make loot scarce.

I'm boosting my spell factory most days now anyway and I voted yes. Now that spells cost purple juice I'd like to use 4 or 5 every battle if I could. Even with the factory boosted, I cant use spells with every attack. Right now I'm barching with 4 lightning and a rage in case I want to hit the core for some nice d-lix!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shutzy

I have not voted as I don't think the options fit my reason. my answer is no but not because it is fine as it is. the reason is that all you clasher out there that are complaining that there is not enough loot. just imagine how little elixir there would be if they enabled you to create more spells without gemming. I have already seen a massive decrease in my ability to save for troop upgrades etc since they changed the spells from gold to elixir.

so no, it would make loot scarce.

---

Not if they reduced the costs and effectiveness as well. If anything, keep the lightning spell at 30 min, but reduce everything else in half. a 45 minute rage spell is too long.

I voted yes. Most armies take about 30-60 minutes to train, but spells take like 2-3 hours. Not a good balance imo.

No. The spells duration is fine as it is now.

Sure I will like to use more rages/heals in my balloons raid. That will definitely make my raids much easier with more rooms for errors. But I had learned to use only 1 rage or none in my raids.

But definitely I will hate to see hoggers/balloons spamming rage or heals in my base with the reduced spell time. The offense is already stronger than defense. There is no need to make it even more stronger.

Just my thoughts.:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lim81

But definitely I will hate to see hoggers/balloons spamming rage or heals in my base with the reduced spell time. The offense is already stronger than defense. There is no need to make it even more stronger.

---

Spells cooking faster won't influence how many times you are raided. Regardless, there will ALWAYS be someone in the world with troops and spells ready for when you go offline. Were you really attacked that much more during the boost period?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chummer1010

I don't think so. They already halfed the spell train time, and the spell times now fit in nicely with my army.

---

Your army must take 3hr to train then.

baloonion takes around 1 hr 30 min to train
giant healer takes around 1 hr to train
barcher takes around 20 min to train
BAM takes around 20 min to train

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by madmonk3y

Spells cooking faster won't influence how many times you are raided. Regardless, there will ALWAYS be someone in the world with troops and spells ready for when you go offline. Were you really attacked that much more during the boost period?

---

I was attacked a lot more with spells during the boost period, but I can't say people were more successful. It just increases the amount of attacks, not the amount of successful attacks.

Rage spell should be cut to 30min instead of 45..

Spell times are perfectly designed by SuperCell. You get one per attack naturally, or 4-5 per attack with boosts. SuperCell is a business. I'm sure high level players boosting their spell factories is a great source of income for them. And those who don't want to boost still get to use spells relatively frequently. This is not changing.