Printable View
I think that the trophy amounts lost when your defeated when you raid should be lowered or go down in stages, like if you are going to lose 30 but you get 49% instead of losing 30 you lose say 10, like the stars you get for destroying over 50%, I thought maybe like if you get under 15% you lose all, under 30% over 15% you lose 2/3 and over 30% to 50% you lose 1/3. It is kind of unfair if you get 51% you get around 5 trophies but if you get 49% you lose 30.
It's already staggered. How it breaks up is in thirds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Simdim13
For each star, you get 1/3 of the possible trophies.
Town Hall being destroyed = 1 star and 1/3 of the trophies
50% damage to town = 1 star and 1/3 of the trophies
100% damage to town = 1 star and 1/3 of the trophies
If the third that it breaks up into ends in a fraction, it gets rounded down to the nearest whole number.
Yeah that's what he said. He said its staggered when you win, it should also be staggered when you lose.Quote:
Originally Posted by techcare
That's a pretty good idea, gets me furious when you get 49% and lose 29 trophies :mad: And then it takes 6 raids to regain them
How is it unfair when offense is so overpowered? If you actually lose a raid when the offense is so much stronger than defense you deserve to lose a lot of trophies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Simdim13
I'm fine with the current system it rewards keeping the attacker in the first 50% of a base because all trophies gained from 1400+ come from the defender so if you loose less if you get close it doesn't reward the defender for a successful defense which often is in the 30-50% zone
If you are able to get to say 40% then you should deserve to not lose all the trophies, but if you only get to 5% then you do deserve to lose them allQuote:
Originally Posted by JtB
You are not understanding the concept, offense is way overpowered. A monkey could get 40% on nearly any base if he had maxed troops equal to the town hall level that he was attacking. Offense has all of the cards stacked in their favor as it is, and yet, you want offense to have even more advantages. Again, if you fail to get at least 50% in an attack when offense is so much more overpowered than defense you deserve to lose more trophies than you would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by Simdim13
This is a wrong subforrum it should be in ideas and feature
Who cares about trophies anyway? Trophy pushing serves no purpose unless you are putting yourself in a different league to farm or if you can be in the top few players in the world for the seasonal gems.
Yes but its stupid how at 49% you lose 30 trophies but 50% you win like 5Quote:
Originally Posted by JtB
This thread makes no sense.. What fun is pushing if there is no risk?
Its stupid how you lose the same amount of trophies if you get 49% than you lose when you get 1%, you should deserve to not lose so many because you managed to kill 49% of their buildings
If you can't get 50% in a raid when offense is so much more overpowered than defense you deserve to lose more trophies. Choose the bases you attack with more discretion and you will win raids nearly every single time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Simdim13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simdim13
The amount of trophies you win/lose is based off of how many trophies you have, compared to your opponent. If the amount of % you get off of a person controls the trophy win/loss, then high level gameplay would be screwed.
I would have to say this is a great idea. The trophies lost should be equal to the trophies gained when you 1,2, or 3 star a person. Sticky this thread and lets see how others feel about it please. Pretty Please.
Well said sirQuote:
Originally Posted by joebates26
No they shouldn't. The amount you can win or lose should be based on the relative difficulty of your opponent as judged by the ranking system. Coincidentally (or not :rolleyes:) that's exactly how the current system works.Quote:
Originally Posted by joebates26