Archers vs Barbarians

Archers :o. Barbarians are useless without WB.

Archers the game would not be the same with out them

Archers for range. But you can't use mass Archers without sending in Barbarians as cheap meat-shields.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sam18840

Write down which one you prefer... Archers can shoot from range but they have really low hit points so they die quickly by splash damage defenses. Barbarians have higher damage than archers and higher hit points but they are unable to shoot from range.
Which one do you normally use or like better?

---

Cant live without both
I prefer barchers
They complete each other

Ok I'm just going to put this out there - try not to judge me ok - Barbs are so cute when they run on mass, if you minimise your view, umm you kinda feel godlike when you drop them all over a base and they run like little oompa loompas (dont look at me like that, you know its true!)

They've always been my favourite troop. :cool:

I love Barbarians for one reason. They're amazing on defence. I've seen 25 Barbarians stop a full level 6 troop raid in it's tracks along with my defences. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tiny2

Ok I'm just going to put this out there - try not to judge me ok - Barbs are so cute when they run on mass, if you minimise your view, umm you kinda feel godlike when you drop them all over a base and they run like little oompa loompas (dont look at me like that, you know its true!)

---

Haha OMG! O M G!
Don't get me wrong ma'am, ain't judging
I am not judging

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sam18840

Write down which one you prefer... Archers can shoot from range but they have really low hit points so they die quickly by splash damage defenses. Barbarians have higher damage than archers and higher hit points but they are unable to shoot from range.
Which one do you normally use or like better?

---

I don't understand this post, id vote archer if there were a poll?

BARC - it got me to where I am at now Tier 1😈👊™