Phal,Quote:
Originally Posted by Phal
if we are gemming raks and elixir (since they didn't do a 1gem on gold), then perhaps that in itself is an agreement from SC that gold is bad. Instead of creating an permanent easement, they created a temporary gemmable solution to increase gold gains.
Except there is no real gold gain, or gold added into the game, to be specific. The rax and elixir pump boost only offers an added offensive bonus to each player, which can translate into more raids per hour and (hopefully) consequent increases in loot raided - still the same gold that's in the system. You raid me, I raid you, that sort of thing. Not saying I'm not getting more gold today than I did yesterday, but that's just because I've been able to raid more in the same time, not because of a sudden injection of more gold into the game. That's an important difference, especially considering your argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMightyTacoGoblin
That was my point. Phal said SC would adjust accordingly. This isnt an adjustment to fix, it's just lets us gem to hunt more. And its odd we cant gem gold or de.
just click edit post, go advanced...Quote:
Originally Posted by lim81
The added rax+elixir pump boost might just be a nice present, it might be some sort of wicked loot experiment, or it might be SC thinks that there is enough loot there but that people might be too focused on just taking it with the traditional BArch or BAM army and that they want people to give other troops a shot as well, to discover that there is loot (gold, DE and elixir) available if one bothers to go for storages.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMightyTacoGoblin
If they had allowed us to gem gold mines it probably would have been interpreted as a way of SC agreeing that loot is bad. People would surely have complained even then, because to some people that comes more naturally than either accepting the boost or thinking of what it means and trying it out.
I for one think that it's partly SC being nice, and partly to see what happens to loot circulation if people use heavier (longer training time) troops as well instead of just BArch or BAM. This is just guesswork on my part, but it's one way to explain why we're not allowed to gem all types of collectors. I'm more than happy at least, since I get a reason to use some bloons for once :)
sure, they could show us the data but the problem with it would be that it wont be the real data.
so bottom line, they better keep the data for themself
There is loot.. Not all collectors, but in gold 2 & 1it is lootfulQuote:
Originally Posted by lim81
Thank you for your help.Quote:
Originally Posted by bbehaghel
I am able to change the title in the thread post but not the title that is display on the forum. Maybe I did it wrongly but still thanks:o
SuperSteve finally make some comments in the "update in new loot system" thread. Though there is not much of reply other than the "hard to find good raids due to boost", "Im finding good raids during weekend", I prefer this compared to total silence. Thank you SuperSteve for stepping out. I know its kind of hard steeping out into such hostile environment.
Also I must thank SC for being generous and offer to the gamers the rax and elixir boost. Though some gamers do not take it too well but there are still gamers who appreciated it. For the gamers who do not like it so much, hopefully the boost offered next week as SC mentioned in FB will be more of your liking.
After all these said, still I am holding this tiny hope that SC will be willing to share some data to show us how this update is working out. Maybe not everything but at least bit and pieces. Showing us how this update is working might relieve some anxiety that some of us is having. Knowing that SC knew our problem and is working on it will make the "waiting for things to be better" much more bearable.
Still hoping for a reply:o
they just wont show us the data, there are not only players browsing this forum ya know