Printable View
CWL bonuses should be based on your average score.
For example: If you score 12 stars in 5 wars, then your average score will be 12/5 or 2.4.
Under the clan tab, a column can be added with the average score for each player.
At the end of the week, the leader will have the option to hand out bonuses based on the average.
In case of a tie, the player with the higher destruction % wins.
In my clan I give the bonuses out to members for a variety of reasons. I would not like the bonuses to be handed out automatically based on average stars per attack.
As a team it may be more strategic for the lower base to attack up for a 2 star and let the higher base dip for a 3 star. If bonuses were given based on average stars per attack then you are effectively punishing players for being good teammates when they go for a 2 instead of a 3.
Fair enough. Each clan can do what they wish, but I think it would be beneficial to have the option to distribute bonuses based on merit. This could minimize the potential for conflict by those who believe they were unfairly left out.
If players go for 2 stars instead of 3, then they are already being "punished" by the current system that rewards those with the most stars. Sure, they will also have a lower average, and may lose a bonus, but that's is a sacrifice that may be necessary in order to win the war.
I feel this is a good step to give leaders some right to take a call, Ultimately its the leader's clan and he should do what is right, Im sure non of the leader will do unfair to the players,
So handing over bonus should be in leaders hand.
I prefer bonus to be handed out by leader or cos for reasons already explained by @middlec. If bonuses are handed out automatically, what's going to stop anyone from being selfish and dipping to get max stars for personal benefit
Yes but if they have an option to give by the average wouldn't that be easier than trying to figure who gets what? Right now the clan list in cwl is ranked by total amount of stars. Wouldnt an option to rank by average stars per war would provide a better way to determine individual performance than the current ranking?Quote:
Originally Posted by agrvika
Not automatically but an option to have it sorted by avg rather than total which is another tool the leaders can use to determine who gets bonuses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Postal
It does also list the number of wars the player was in, so it isn't exactly hard to work out what their average was.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron5500
Sorry I misunderstood before.. Yeah listing avg stars earned by members will be a good additionQuote:
Originally Posted by Ron5500
No offence but I couldn't reply as you closed the thread for tweak to SM toggle thread.. The op is asking for a new feature. It didn't happen before Christmas, before the update we had to toggle prior to attacking, op is just asking to display both sm and classic buttons and disable the other once one is used. Yes it's off topic with this thread. I'll not bring it up again here sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajax
I closed that thread because it was no longer relevant. And no, the OP in that thread was well before the change allowing us to toggle up to point of deployment. It was only the (necro) post immediately before yours which was talking about the current situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Postal
Personally I like to give the extra bonus’s to those who donated the most in war ccs
Personally, I like to give the bonuses to those who donated the most and were most active throughout the week of cwl
Yep you r right I didn't realise that 😅..my apologiesQuote:
Originally Posted by Ajax