Originally Posted by
Sammydict
Do you mind highlighting which post/part of it felt insinuated? For I don't believe I did that or even intended too. So, do highlight it and allow me to clarify on it to erode any misunderstanding caused due to it.
And to talk about, saying this/that type of leadership is right or wrong? Well, I clearly didn't do that. I no where has favored one type of leadership over other. I simply been making or trying to make points on why a capable leadership, which can be of many varying style, shouldn't have much troubling handling this task of distributing BONUSES to just selective few individual. I in fact shared one of the possible strategy to do that. And that doesn't mean it's the only way through or like you said to reach Rome. They're definitely other ways available. But expecting leadership to be complete hassle free things sounds unfair and cop out.
Even if you look at it from real life perspective, there's a reason why few of the leaders of the world are praised, worship, idolised over possible 100, 1000 or even millions and some ain't even respected or even considered as a leadership.