Please bring back completely losing shield on attack

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

How is being more active making sc more money than people actually buying guards and resources? I currently don't see a reason to buy resources at all unless you also buy a shield be ause you'll just be attacked unless you spend all of it immediately. so how is attacking making them more money if you're just gonna possibley steal resources that people actually bought?

---

Active players will, most probably, not buy resources, ever; they will raid for them. They will, however, be more likely to gem the tail end of an upgrade; so they can start another (with your loot). Revenue from shields bought by casual players will be insignificant compared to the income from active & very active players.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

Why wouldn't attacking being based off of trophies fix that? It seems to me currently that the strategy is "upgrade army not defenses". If your trophy count was based off both with a close to 1:1 ratio of winning defenses and attacks it'd make it an even playing field for extremely active players and players that just don't have that much time

---

I'm not quite following your train of thought here.

However, my conclusion is; either adapt to the current meta or find another game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

Rip my hopes for this game then lol. I'm just gonna go back to clash royale where you can actually win and not be active 24/7 at least the game was fun a few years ago

---

Game is still fun.

I have no idea what exact problem you have.

Play at your own pace. No one says you to play 24*7.

Just ignore "revenge" button. Foucs on "attack" button.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by masteryasin

Game is still fun.

I have no idea what exact problem you have.

Play at your own pace. No one says you to play 24*7.

Just ignore "revenge" button. Foucs on "attack" button.

---

It's not very fun to play a pvp oriented gane where it's pvp style rewards players to manipulate the matchmaking by spamming attacks or purposely dropping your rank I've never played a game with this type if playstyle before

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

It's not about "getting my revenge" it's about me losing tonnes of resources to someone that's gonna eventually lose them to a player undeserving of it because they got lucky. I don't know if anyone else agrees but I'm pretty sure this game is about strategy not luck

---

It all evens out in the end. Yes, there is luck involved in any individual attack or defense, but over the course of a month long season, let alone playing for years, it all evens out. Also, it doesn’t matter anyway because if you are an active player you have no problem keeping all of your builders busy. Loot isn’t an issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

Why is everyone here obsessed with attacking 10+ times a day? I don't have nearly as much time to be playing this game that frequently. I just want a chance to actually progress without getting my butt handed to me by an attacker 1 or 2 townhall levels higher than me with defenses that are way too low for their townhall level. I think actually being able to revenge and get your loot back without someone attacking them first resulting in them being shielded before i can even get my loot back would fix it

---

If you cannot attack 10+ times per day, you don’t likely progress as fast as someone who does. That is a good thing. It should be that way.

If the player is 1-2 halls higher than you, there is a loot penalty causing them to take less loot from you than they would otherwise receive. Whether that player has low defenses or not is irrlevant. Search for an attack, use the next button a few times, find a base with a lot of loot and steal it. There is no benefit to stealing it from the player that previously attacked you. There are millions out there to choose from.

Why do you think the player’s defenses are “too low.” Too low according to whom? You could rush ahead like that too if you think there is an advantage to it, right?

If you are playing low in trophies you often can revenge. If you are playing in the upper leagues there is a delay built in to make it harder to revenge and that is needed to prevent players cooperating together.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

It's not very fun to play a pvp oriented gane where it's pvp style rewards players to manipulate the matchmaking by spamming attacks or purposely dropping your rank I've never played a game with this type if playstyle before

---

The main base is not PvP. It is not a PvP game. The builder base side is PvP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2222

The main base is not PvP. It is not a PvP game. The builder base side is PvP.

---

Lol what? You attack other players bases and defend other plaers attacks that's the definition of pvp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

Lol what? You attack other players bases and defend other plaers attacks that's the definition of pvp

---

PvP is when you two players attack each other. That is what happens on builder base. That is not what happens on the main village the vast majority of the time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2222

It all evens out in the end. Yes, there is luck involved in any individual attack or defense, but over the course of a month long season, let alone playing for years, it all evens out. Also, it doesn’t matter anyway because if you are an active player you have no problem keeping all of your builders busy. Loot isn’t an issue.



If you cannot attack 10+ times per day, you don’t likely progress as fast as someone who does. That is a good thing. It should be that way.

If the player is 1-2 halls higher than you, there is a loot penalty causing them to take less loot from you than they would otherwise receive. Whether that player has low defenses or not is irrlevant. Search for an attack, use the next button a few times, find a base with a lot of loot and steal it. There is no benefit to stealing it from the player that previously attacked you. There are millions out there to choose from.

Why do you think the player’s defenses are “too low.” Too low according to whom? You could rush ahead like that too if you think there is an advantage to it, right?

If you are playing low in trophies you often can revenge. If you are playing in the upper leagues there is a delay built in to make it harder to revenge and that is needed to prevent players cooperating together.

---

That's the thing though it's rare for me to ever find an enemy base that has an advantageous amount of resources to steal that is also lightly defended because they're extremely active players that attack constantly and when they're not attacking they take one 3 star attack giving them a long enough shield to spend their resources

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

That's the thing though it's rare for me to ever find an enemy base that has an advantageous amount of resources to steal that is also lightly defended because they're extremely active players that attack constantly and when they're not attacking they take one 3 star attack giving them a long enough shield to spend their resources

---

You either need to change leagues to fit your attacking army better or you need to change your army to fit your league. It is very easy to get big loot attacks over and over and over. I can keep 5 builders busy in any trophy league, but of course the army differs depending on the league.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marchizmoh

A. Because its unfair to players with lower townhalls/division that are attacked by them to lose resources and not be able to regain any back by revenging because They're under a 12 hour shield because their awful base gets 3 starred way too easily by people actually in their division and B. Because they end up feeding resources to the players that actually are lucky enough to attack their base when they're offline and shieldless which rewards for simply being lucky

---

So basically, you are saying they should be punished mostly for things totally outside their control, just because you don't like their style of play.