So you’ve already been raided and taken to the cleaners, why be penalised again for trying to take some of it back?
Printable View
So you’ve already been raided and taken to the cleaners, why be penalised again for trying to take some of it back?
Why should a revenge attack be treated any differently to a standard attack?Quote:
Originally Posted by craigsawayagain
If they were it would encourage players to stay in low trophies knowing they could do many revenge attacks whilst under a 16hr shield!
I think it should be 1/2 or 2/3 of the penalty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigsawayagain
As soon as you're allowed to attack through shields, then there's no point in having a shield system to begin with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammad80
Edit: Disregard my statement above. Misread the idea.
They're not suggesting to be able to attack through a shield. They're saying that, if you have a shield and revenge attack someone, your shield duration should not be reduced.Quote:
Originally Posted by DARDANIUS
Example: I have a 16 hour shield and revenge attack someone. OP's idea is that my shield should not be reduced to 13 hours. Rather it should remain at 16 hours.
All that being said I still disagree with the entire thing. When you attack someone you lose part of your shield. Revenge is an attack and should be treated just the same.
Oh, I read their posts wrong then. Whoops. :saywhat:Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix1027
I completely agree with all the reasons why this shouldn't be implemented.
Nead a countdown timer on the opponents active shield so where not waiting around to re attack make the revenge button green when the shields got 5 miblns left or some indication.
Ruled out. Please read the stickies before posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSquirreldata
https://forum.supercell.com/showthre...rum-guidelines
Sometimes I make 30 attacks a day, I can't imagine all those people coming back for justice.Quote:
Originally Posted by craigsawayagain