Mmm...I appreciate a caped crusader for truth as much as the next guy and truth is not outlawed. For reference though your 'truth' is actually 'opinion'...only my truth is truth..ask anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris2000
Printable View
Mmm...I appreciate a caped crusader for truth as much as the next guy and truth is not outlawed. For reference though your 'truth' is actually 'opinion'...only my truth is truth..ask anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris2000
guys, check this out the reality of top players (last season) almost all top player accounts played by a single person. and i have a proof related this. if moderators allow me to post that instagram video......
One question How supercell knows that someone is sharing his/her account? players are allowed to access their accounts from two different devices!!!
While somebody could indeed run the account 18h-20h/24h everyday by oneself, Holps, CaptainJack and all, you can't tell me that it is humanly possible to run it 24/7 by a single person. From a tech point of view, there is also nothing easier for SC than to track accounts searching 24/7. So, why not going and fixing this by setting up a search limit ? I mean, it would be such an improvement, such a recognition to all the players who have been competing in a fair play mode by themselves for years... And this would really give every fair-play player a chance to top the leaderboard (again).Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainJackjr
I got to over 6000 without spending a single cent and without anyone helping me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris2000
Paying “their pilots” wouldn’t be money that supercell gains/loses.
Sounds to me like you might be a bit salty about the cloud issue and the time strain on getting to over 6000 so you’re making up excuses
If anything is posted that identifies, accuses, names and shames etc then the thread will end up on the naughty step.Quote:
Originally Posted by udayjoy
Well this was really the point of the first post made by Holps. Account sharing is far harder to get 100% proof of the kind required to act to ban, as opposed to say when the Octopus tentacle wraps around a modified game file (no false positives there). OP is wrong I believe to think there is any connection to SC income from gem purchases. In general, it is better not to make a complex explanation for something where you don’t know the facts for sure, when a simple explanation is perfectly good, especially a less motive laden one. The simple explanation here is that kind of cheating is harder to prove with the required level of certainty to be sure you never accidentally ban the innocent along with the guilty.Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainJackjr
check out this video. and you will find that how top players pay for pushing services
I am not promoting this guy but i just sharing with you about the truth of top leaderboard. if anyone having problem with this post, i remove it asap!
edit - Video removed.
Going over 6000 is no longer toping the leaderboard since decades... I'm not talking about reaching 6k which is now very easy and doesn't mean anything. My complaints are about those reaching 6300+ currently. And that is another (money) story.Quote:
Originally Posted by Activeleader
I gave fair warning that if anything was posted that identified players this would be closed.....naughty step it is.