Yes, that's what we all do when we disagree with your opinion...
LOL.
Printable View
It is too bad another thread has been taken over by one side not respectfully debating against the other side, but instead claiming it is totally invalid, selfish, etc. I guess I can mark another thread off the list of ones I follow.
I myself can't see an issue with, for example, not getting enough points to unlock a book tier, but I can understand that if 20 people in a clan desperately want the books they are going to want the other clan members to help them to get them, possibly regardless of whether or not the other clan mates can actually use them.
If that's the case, and these members are being pressured/coerced into helping then yeah, they're gonna kick back about it.
Also, if that is the case, then I think it's totally down to the clan management to sort out. I.E. either have a word with the ones wanting the help and tell them to ease off a bit, or have a word with the ones not so keen to help and explain that getting x amount of points each is now a clan requirement. Either the whole clan will come to some compromise, or some people will leave and find a new clan. My clan has done the former. We discussed what we think we can viably achieve and how to go about it and now we're getting on with it. No drama, no complaints, no issues.
We still war twice per week, donations still get filled. In fact, looking at our stats, donations, indeed activity in general, is up across the board. I can't see how that is a bad thing. We might not get to unlock the rewards we want, but everyone is playing more in an attempt to do so and if we don't, well, we don't. But, we won't fall out about it, or shout or kick people, we'll just try and do better next time.
Clearly, a lot of people that don't share our views are playing in a lot of clans that also don't share our (and possibly their players) views. If clan leaders managed their clan mates expectations correctly, all this would go away. Instead of that, it's all about "me,me,me".
"Dude" I did reply to your thread, but you ignored it like you have my other ones. And that hurts my feelings.
In my opinion, when you use quotes in response, you're purposely ignoring the content of the discussion and resorting to tactics to make one feel inferior.
But that's just my opinion.
Exactly this. Altho I am still having a hard time believing it is all about me,me,me. I wish someone had some better reasons (other then the cloud argument which in itself is kind of a me,me,me thing, but that is pushing all about anyway) for NOT doing frequent clan games or for that matter, clan games all the time.
The warring clans can still go to war. The farmer clans can still farm. The bb clans can still bb. Let the clan games clans do their thing. We finally have gotten a 4th way of playing the game which is fun and still its not good enough for some people. <sigh.>
I think you are putting the burden of proof in the wrong quarter. People have given reasons that explain their thoughts that a slightly reduced frequency would be preferable. You’ve shot those down declaring them simply invalid because they don’t convince you, and are insisting they need to provide more in order to do that. They don’t - they’ve given their reasons that explain their viewpoints. Maybe instead of focusing on criticising what they say and attributing motives, instead you provide some arguments explaining why high frequency clan games are better for the game experience as opposed to moderate frequency over the longer term?