If leader set minimum target to 1500points before clan game start. Algorithm will not add points who score lower than 1500 in clan's total.
Well said .... I'm in several clans, none are making such a fuss... in one we have reached max tier, by working together with individuals without a stable clan as well as another clan, where people just don't want to put in the time. Those from that clan who do, were invited to our clan and we all got max rewards. In the next clan those participating are happy to be at almost 30k this morning and those at the bottom, purely leeching, will be kicked ... yea, they get these rewards from us once, nobody eats a slice of bread less because of it ...
Sending mail is a good tools already available in game. thoes who are less active ask them which challenges they will like to 'accept' save it for them or send massage them on discord or any other app that clan use for communication when challange is available.
@op Very good idea and I totally agree with it....
In general in this game there are no tools to manage clan, we should get some features for leaders to be able to manage the clan, more than kick out and clan messages !
Yep.
Maybe it's too complicated to let a player KEEP his achieved Clan Games points, IF he is kicked during the games, while reducing the Clan's total by the same amount.
The low or high performing player would have his X points and would be able to continue in another clan if he wanted.
The clan would have X points less, but have the potential to get a better performing player in, before the Games close.
Right now, a player is locked into the Clan Games until the end .. but a Clan is also stuck with a low performing player until the end.
There is nothing different in this situation than from Clan Wars .. Though, in Clan Wars, you CAN decide when they start and you CAN exclude "new" players from the war .. or include them and kick them before Battle Day (which I've done several times .. just to get to 40 or 50 participants)
BUT, I repeat: I don't care about low performing players, as long as we get full rewards.
IF we don't get full rewards, THEN I'll take swift action based on the data I've recorded about previous Games ..
/Affront
It's your opinion I don't share the same thoughts....and whatever are the drawbacks the advantages are more better...cuz it's unfair to have someone making 40 pts and getting the same as someone who have 3000 pts ! You can kick him yes, but he would already profit from other players efforts ... since you can"t choose who can play or not clan game, someones can make only 40 pts and profit which is unfair. on the same time, if you have new players you can't know before you test them if they are or not good, but they will be able to play the clan games and do 40 pts and leave, and get the benefict from your clan effort....
it's not the only thing missing to be able to lead the clan, the game should provide more tools to manage a clan, like a target selector for war, a leader who can delete troops in clan war castles when someone put something wrong, to know who is giving or not trooprs for wars etc....too many helpfull tools can be added.
Where did you see advantages? Algorithm will not add any point in clan total untill players score their 1500 which is minimum score set by clan leader. And if you think why not? It's means you want their points to reach high tiers but you don't want to give them rewards. think about legend league players not everyone likes BB challenges. You can think about yourself but SC has to think about every conditions.