TH sniping should no longer give shields

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mdrxc3

Threads like this makes me more motivated to farm my lv 10 walls even faster before idiots start proposing stupid ideas to kill off farming. Good thing SC doesn't pay much attention to these forums

---

Amen........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mdrxc3

Threads like this makes me more motivated to farm my lv 10 walls even faster before idiots start proposing stupid ideas to kill off farming. Good thing SC doesn't pay much attention to these forums

---

How will this 'kill farming'? All it would do is make you more likely to be hit by an actual attack instead of a sniper, admittedly losing a little more loot, and as recompense you would be able to farm off the farmers who used to hide behind th shields = more loot to be taken in total, plus it would give some value back to trophies.
I am in favour of this even though I am a farmer myself.

I will let this be my last response to this thread. I would rather not stoop to personal attacks.

No, I am not a bitter champion league player. However, after reading pages upon pages of how the players at the Championship level are all che@ters and are cry babies etc... I wanted to turn the tables on the farmers. What was ironic about it all was that the players that were berating the champion players for che@ating and saying good riddance to them were exploiting the game in the exact same way!

A cheap shield is a cheap shield, it doesn't matter how you obtain it. Admittedly, the process and purpose are different, but it is what it is: an exploitation of game mechanics.

Removing the cheap shield tactics for farmers will not ruin the game. In my opinion, it will make the game much better. Yes, even the farmers will need to think about better defensive layouts, rather than hiding behind a cheap shields to protect their resources. More importantly, it will make the game a lot fairer for all to play.

Hopefully, Super Cell will consider removal of this game exploitation in the next update. :o

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HedleyLammarr

Hey gonfreakss. Im sure i read u stated u were a farmer. Call me cynical but u sound like a high cupped champion whos really upset their method of preventing a resonable raid against them (you) has been removed.

The reason sc have patched the ♥♥♥♥♥ is cos ppl dont want to stare at clouds for 8 hours. The solution seems fair in my opinion.

No-1 can put a resonable argument for allowing cheap shield without sounding childish (ex - if this exploit continued then there is a good chance some/most will NEVER be attacked by someone who isnt an affiliate). Therefore the arguments become invalid.

So now u turn ur attention to this thread proposal.

It reeks of desperation. The comparisons are laughable & its takes me back to my childhood days where im fighting with my brother over the most ludicrous things just cos im upset over something.

Where ur analogies fall short is ur che@t involves collusion & deception to prevent a fair matchmaking thus producing a gridlocked system of cloud staring. Where as leaving an unprotected TH is open to a huge range of possibilities

U fail to understand 1 has a guaranteed outcome. The other has multiple outcomes. There is simply NO comparison

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GonFreakss

A cheap shield is a cheap shield, it doesn't matter how you obtain it. Admittedly, the process and purpose are different, but it is what it is: an exploitation of game mechanics.

Removing the cheap shield tactics for farmers will not ruin the game. In my opinion, it will make the game much better. Yes, even the farmers will need to think about better defensive layouts, rather than hiding behind a cheap shields to protect their resources. More importantly, it will make the game a lot fairer for all to play.

Hopefully, Super Cell will consider removal of this game exploitation in the next update. :o

---

Completely agree !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GonFreakss

I will let this be my last response to this thread. I would rather not stoop to personal attacks.

No, I am not a bitter champion league player. However, after reading pages upon pages of how the players at the Championship level are all che@ters and are cry babies etc... I wanted to turn the tables on the farmers. What was ironic about it all was that the players that were berating the champion players for che@ating and saying good riddance to them were exploiting the game in the exact same way!

A cheap shield is a cheap shield, it doesn't matter how you obtain it. Admittedly, the process and purpose are different, but it is what it is: an exploitation of game mechanics.

Removing the cheap shield tactics for farmers will not ruin the game. In my opinion, it will make the game much better. Yes, even the farmers will need to think about better defensive layouts, rather than hiding behind a cheap shields to protect their resources. More importantly, it will make the game a lot fairer for all to play.

Hopefully, Super Cell will consider removal of this game exploitation in the next update. :o

---

Done deal, agreed, next update?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bighowie83

Better solution is to make townhalls store a decent amount of gold/elixir, say about 100,000 each or something, not like 1,000 they store now.

---

Yeah, I don't disagree with the OP's sentiment, but this is a better solution.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fearless

This would completely kill farming. :/

---

Well, except that you'd have more targets in the attack queue with good loot to hit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyng99

How will this 'kill farming'? All it would do is make you more likely to be hit by an actual attack instead of a sniper, admittedly losing a little more loot, and as recompense you would be able to farm off the farmers who used to hide behind th shields = more loot to be taken in total, plus it would give some value back to trophies.
I am in favour of this even though I am a farmer myself.

---

Exactly; this just creates a more fluid loot distribution system where what was stolen is getting stolen by someone else. It doesn't kill farming at all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GonFreakss

A cheap shield is a cheap shield, it doesn't matter how you obtain it. Admittedly, the process and purpose are different, but it is what it is: an exploitation of game mechanics.

---

This is just plain silly.
Equating leaving TH outside with che@t shielding is totally ABSURD!

Che@t shielding involves colluding with another player(s) to BLOCK ANYONE ATTACKING you with guaranteed outcome.

Leaving TH outside is nothing more than your own base design and strategy - with totally unpredictable outcome while your base is still OPEN TO ANY ATTACKS from normal match making!

Huge Huge difference!

Why is leaving TH outside an exploit? Why should one have to hide TH behind walls? Why should one have to have walls?
Base design is total freedom. You can use walls to paint alphabets to send a message if you want - is that an exploit?

Where is the rule that one has to hide certain buildings behind walls? TH? Storage? Defense?

Some high level players level all their storage outside as a shield - would you call it an exploit?

Some people leave TH outside with level 7 teslas all around it - it's part of the game and part of the strategy. Would you call it an exploit?

Some people would take the outside TH and proceed to attack the storage for a 2 star - would you call it an exploit?

Leaving TH outside is an exploit,
Leaving storages outside for free win is an exploit,
Not protecting builder hut to help Union Buster is an exploit,
Not refilling xbow is an exploit,
Not refilling inferno towers is an exploit,
EVERYTHING IS AN EXPLOIT!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yesup

This is just plain silly.
Equating leaving TH outside with che@t shielding is totally ABSURD!

Che@t shielding involves colluding with another player(s) to BLOCK ANYONE ATTACKING you with guaranteed outcome.

Leaving TH outside is nothing more than your own base design and strategy - with totally unpredictable outcome while your base is still OPEN TO ANY ATTACKS from normal match making!

Huge Huge difference!

Why is leaving TH outside an exploit? Why should one have to hide TH behind walls? Why should one have to have walls?
Base design is total freedom. You can use walls to paint alphabets to send a message if you want - is that an exploit?

Where is the rule that one has to hide certain buildings behind walls? TH? Storage? Defense?

Some high level players level all their storage outside as a shield - would you call it an exploit?

Some people leave TH outside with level 7 teslas all around it - it's part of the game and part of the strategy. Would you call it an exploit?

Some people would take the outside TH and proceed to attack the storage for a 2 star - would you call it an exploit?

---

Well I never. I don't want to argue with one of your posts for once. Nice yesup!

This thread is just trophy hunters vs farmers, except for a trophy hunter to be any good they would have needed to be a farmer (or a gėmmer) to get their base upgraded. And more than likely putting their town hall outside… hypocrites much?